QQQN vs. IVOG

Last updated Jul 19, 2026

QQQN (VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF) and IVOG (Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds - QQQN tracks the Nasdaq Q-50 Index while IVOG tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. QQQN charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IVOG.

Performance

QQQN vs. IVOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IVOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

QQQN

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IVOG

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: -2.80%
• 6M: 9.28%
• YTD: 16.56%
• 1Y: 22.32%
• 3Y*: 14.13%
• 5Y*: 8.42%
• 10Y*: 11.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQN vs. IVOG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	0.00%
IVOG Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF	11.96%

Return for Risk

QQQN vs. IVOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IVOG

IVOG Risk / Return Rank: 50
IVOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
IVOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
IVOG Omega Ratio Rank: 41
IVOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
IVOG Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQN vs. IVOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IVOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQQN	IVOG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.25	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.88	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.22	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.30	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	8.66	—

Drawdowns

QQQN vs. IVOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQN drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum IVOG drawdown of -39.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQN and IVOG.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQN	IVOG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-39.32%	+39.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.69%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-25.61%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.31%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.32%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-4.24%	+4.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-5.85%	+5.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.57%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QQQN	IVOG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.63%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.92%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	17.84%	-17.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	20.71%	-20.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	20.59%	-20.59%

QQQN vs. IVOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQN has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than IVOG's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

QQQN vs. IVOG - Dividend Comparison

QQQN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IVOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IVOG Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF	0.55%	0.64%	0.79%	1.15%	1.05%	0.47%	0.74%	1.17%	1.01%	0.93%	1.11%	1.04%
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, QQQN or IVOG?

On fees, IVOG is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQQN or IVOG?

IVOG is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for QQQN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQQN or IVOG?

IVOG has the higher dividend yield at 0.55%, compared with 0.00% for QQQN.

What is the main difference between QQQN and IVOG?

QQQN tracks Nasdaq Q-50 Index, while IVOG tracks S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: VictoryShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QQQN and 0.10% for IVOG.