PAMC vs. QMOM
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM).
PAMC and QMOM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PAMC is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Lunt Capital U.S. MidCap Multi-Factor Rotation Index. It was launched on Jun 24, 2020. QMOM is an actively managed fund by Alpha Architect. It was launched on Dec 2, 2015.
Performance
PAMC vs. QMOM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PAMC vs. QMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAMC Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF | 2.88% | 1.54% | 26.20% | 19.30% | -12.15% | 13.15% | 34.03% |
QMOM Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF | 4.62% | 2.36% | 30.43% | 9.50% | -6.99% | -4.06% | 50.10% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAMC achieves a 2.88% return, which is significantly lower than QMOM's 4.62% return.
PAMC
- 1D
- 4.11%
- 1M
- -4.94%
- YTD
- 2.88%
- 6M
- 2.73%
- 1Y
- 14.36%
- 3Y*
- 13.95%
- 5Y*
- 7.11%
- 10Y*
- —
QMOM
- 1D
- 5.91%
- 1M
- -6.64%
- YTD
- 4.62%
- 6M
- 6.57%
- 1Y
- 15.61%
- 3Y*
- 15.94%
- 5Y*
- 6.10%
- 10Y*
- 12.16%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PAMC vs. QMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PAMC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than QMOM's 0.28% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PAMC vs. QMOM — Risk / Return Rank
PAMC
QMOM
PAMC vs. QMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PAMC | QMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.67 | 0.61 | +0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.08 | 0.97 | +0.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.13 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.09 | 1.35 | -0.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.20 | 4.68 | -0.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PAMC | QMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 | 0.61 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.25 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.45 | +0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between PAMC and QMOM is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PAMC vs. QMOM - Dividend Comparison
PAMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, more than QMOM's 0.52% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAMC Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF | 1.26% | 1.11% | 0.97% | 0.69% | 1.29% | 0.36% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QMOM Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF | 0.52% | 0.54% | 1.40% | 0.87% | 1.59% | 0.12% | 0.08% | 0.01% | 0.05% | 0.13% | 0.34% |
Drawdowns
PAMC vs. QMOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAMC drawdown since its inception was -27.04%, smaller than the maximum QMOM drawdown of -39.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAMC and QMOM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAMC | QMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.04% | -39.13% | +12.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.60% | -13.55% | -0.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.04% | -27.00% | -0.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.30% | -7.48% | +1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.66% | -13.11% | +5.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.52% | 3.92% | -0.40% |
Volatility
PAMC vs. QMOM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) is 9.01%, while Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM) has a volatility of 12.00%. This indicates that PAMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QMOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PAMC | QMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.01% | 12.00% | -2.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.66% | 19.09% | -4.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.61% | 25.78% | -4.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.42% | 24.72% | -4.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.82% | 26.28% | -5.46% |