PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QMOM vs. AVUV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QMOM vs. AVUV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QMOM achieves a 24.65% return, which is significantly higher than AVUV's 17.96% return.


QMOM

1D
-0.37%
1M
6.10%
YTD
24.65%
6M
26.71%
1Y
31.51%
3Y*
23.22%
5Y*
11.55%
10Y*
13.82%

AVUV

1D
-0.97%
1M
1.21%
YTD
17.96%
6M
17.23%
1Y
36.48%
3Y*
19.24%
5Y*
10.71%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QMOM vs. AVUV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
QMOM
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF
24.65%2.36%30.43%9.50%-6.99%-4.06%61.94%6.26%
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
17.96%7.44%9.28%22.82%-4.91%42.20%6.43%8.50%

Correlation

The correlation between QMOM and AVUV is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019

0.63

The correlation between QMOM and AVUV shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QMOM vs. AVUV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QMOM
AVUV

Industrials

37.5%
13.9%

Technology

23.9%
7.0%

Basic Materials

9.0%
4.9%

Healthcare

8.9%
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

7.4%
18.0%

Energy

5.5%
18.2%

Communication Services

4.2%
2.8%

Utilities

2.0%
0.1%

Financial Services

1.9%
25.8%

Consumer Defensive

1.6%
4.5%

Real Estate

-

0.7%

Industrials

QMOM
37.5%
AVUV
13.9%

Technology

QMOM
23.9%
AVUV
7.0%

Basic Materials

QMOM
9.0%
AVUV
4.9%

Healthcare

QMOM
8.9%
AVUV
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

QMOM
7.4%
AVUV
18.0%

Energy

QMOM
5.5%
AVUV
18.2%

Communication Services

QMOM
4.2%
AVUV
2.8%

Utilities

QMOM
2.0%
AVUV
0.1%

Financial Services

QMOM
1.9%
AVUV
25.8%

Consumer Defensive

QMOM
1.6%
AVUV
4.5%

Real Estate

QMOM

-

AVUV
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QMOM vs. AVUV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QMOM
QMOM Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
QMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
QMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
QMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
QMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

AVUV
AVUV Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
AVUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVUV Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
AVUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVUV Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QMOM vs. AVUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QMOMAVUVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.36

2.10

-0.74

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.91

3.02

-1.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.36

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

4.61

-2.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.15

13.69

-4.54

QMOM vs. AVUV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QMOM Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is lower than the AVUV Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QMOM and AVUV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QMOMAVUVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

2.10

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.47

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.56

-0.04

Drawdowns

QMOM vs. AVUV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QMOM drawdown since its inception was -39.13%, smaller than the maximum AVUV drawdown of -49.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMOM and AVUV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QMOMAVUVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.13%

-49.42%

+10.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.65%

-7.95%

-4.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.46%

-28.79%

+2.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.82%

-28.79%

+1.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-1.12%

+0.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.92%

-7.95%

-4.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.45%

2.67%

+0.78%

Volatility

QMOM vs. AVUV - Volatility Comparison

Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM) has a higher volatility of 8.32% compared to Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) at 4.08%. This indicates that QMOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QMOMAVUVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.32%

4.08%

+4.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.78%

11.34%

+8.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.30%

17.54%

+5.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.19%

22.74%

+1.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.49%

28.30%

-1.81%

QMOM vs. AVUV - Expense Ratio Comparison

QMOM has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than AVUV's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

QMOM vs. AVUV - Dividend Comparison

QMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than AVUV's 1.29% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
1.29%1.58%1.61%1.65%1.74%1.28%1.21%0.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QMOM
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF
0.44%0.54%1.40%0.87%1.59%0.12%0.08%0.01%0.05%0.13%0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


QMOM and AVUV have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QMOM has higher volatility (8.32%) compared to AVUV (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QMOM dropped -39.13% vs AVUV's -49.42%.

On 5-year performance, QMOM leads with 11.55% vs 10.71% for AVUV. On fees, AVUV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, AVUV has been the lower-risk option at 4.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QMOM has performed better with a 11.55% return vs 10.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVUV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for QMOM.

AVUV has the higher dividend yield at 1.29%, compared with 0.44% for QMOM.

QMOM is categorized as Momentum, while AVUV is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for QMOM and 0.25% for AVUV.

AVUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QMOM and AVUV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer