PAMC vs. IJK
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) and iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK).
PAMC and IJK are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PAMC is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Lunt Capital U.S. MidCap Multi-Factor Rotation Index. It was launched on Jun 24, 2020. IJK is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400/Citigroup Growth Index. It was launched on Jul 24, 2000. Both PAMC and IJK are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
PAMC vs. IJK - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PAMC vs. IJK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAMC Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF | 4.43% | 1.54% | 26.20% | 19.30% | -12.15% | 13.15% | 34.03% |
IJK iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF | 5.12% | 7.28% | 15.68% | 17.41% | -19.03% | 18.68% | 31.45% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAMC achieves a 4.43% return, which is significantly lower than IJK's 5.12% return.
PAMC
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- -4.41%
- YTD
- 4.43%
- 6M
- 4.06%
- 1Y
- 15.41%
- 3Y*
- 14.52%
- 5Y*
- 7.43%
- 10Y*
- —
IJK
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- -5.74%
- YTD
- 5.12%
- 6M
- 6.22%
- 1Y
- 22.12%
- 3Y*
- 13.42%
- 5Y*
- 5.91%
- 10Y*
- 10.57%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PAMC vs. IJK - Expense Ratio Comparison
PAMC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IJK's 0.24% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PAMC vs. IJK — Risk / Return Rank
PAMC
IJK
PAMC vs. IJK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) and iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PAMC | IJK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.71 | 0.99 | -0.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.14 | 1.53 | -0.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.21 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.18 | 1.68 | -0.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.56 | 7.18 | -2.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PAMC | IJK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 | 0.99 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.29 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.35 | +0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between PAMC and IJK is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PAMC vs. IJK - Dividend Comparison
PAMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, more than IJK's 0.61% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAMC Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF | 1.24% | 1.11% | 0.97% | 0.69% | 1.29% | 0.36% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IJK iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF | 0.61% | 0.66% | 0.79% | 1.13% | 1.08% | 0.50% | 0.70% | 1.09% | 1.13% | 0.93% | 1.15% | 1.12% |
Drawdowns
PAMC vs. IJK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAMC drawdown since its inception was -27.04%, smaller than the maximum IJK drawdown of -54.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAMC and IJK.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAMC | IJK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.04% | -54.47% | +27.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.60% | -13.71% | +0.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.04% | -29.24% | +2.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.89% | -5.74% | +0.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.66% | -10.86% | +3.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.53% | 3.20% | +0.33% |
Volatility
PAMC vs. IJK - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) has a higher volatility of 9.01% compared to iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK) at 7.86%. This indicates that PAMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IJK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PAMC | IJK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.01% | 7.86% | +1.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.73% | 13.37% | +1.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.65% | 22.39% | -0.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.42% | 20.63% | -0.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.82% | 21.00% | -0.18% |