IJK vs. IJH
IJK (iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF) and IJH (iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IJK is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index, while IJH is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IJK returned 11.71%/yr vs 11.43%/yr for IJH. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. IJK charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for IJH.
Performance
IJK vs. IJH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IJK achieves a 19.65% return, which is significantly higher than IJH's 15.37% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IJK having a 11.71% annualized return and IJH not far behind at 11.43%.
IJK
- 1D
- 1.29%
- 1M
- 4.70%
- YTD
- 19.65%
- 6M
- 18.04%
- 1Y
- 31.58%
- 3Y*
- 17.26%
- 5Y*
- 9.17%
- 10Y*
- 11.71%
IJH
- 1D
- 1.07%
- 1M
- 4.37%
- YTD
- 15.37%
- 6M
- 13.91%
- 1Y
- 27.00%
- 3Y*
- 15.37%
- 5Y*
- 9.37%
- 10Y*
- 11.43%
IJK vs. IJH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJK iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF | 19.65% | 7.28% | 15.68% | 17.41% | -19.03% | 18.68% | 22.45% | 25.96% | -10.53% | 19.64% |
IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 15.37% | 7.42% | 13.92% | 16.40% | -13.11% | 24.72% | 13.60% | 26.10% | -11.19% | 16.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between IJK and IJH is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2000 | 0.97 |
The correlation between IJK and IJH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
IJK vs. IJH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IJK
IJH
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Industrials
IJK
IJH
Technology
IJK
IJH
Healthcare
IJK
IJH
Consumer Cyclical
IJK
IJH
Financial Services
IJK
IJH
Real Estate
IJK
IJH
Basic Materials
IJK
IJH
Energy
IJK
IJH
Utilities
IJK
IJH
Consumer Defensive
IJK
IJH
Communication Services
IJK
IJH
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IJK vs. IJH — Risk / Return Rank
IJK
IJH
IJK vs. IJH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK) and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IJK | IJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.30 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | 3.07 | +0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.55 | 11.23 | +1.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IJK vs. IJH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IJK drawdown since its inception was -54.47%, roughly equal to the maximum IJH drawdown of -55.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJK and IJH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IJK | IJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.47% | -55.07% | +0.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.92% | -8.83% | -1.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.63% | -24.10% | -1.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.24% | -24.10% | -5.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.25% | -42.18% | +2.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | -0.50% | +0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.78% | -7.56% | -3.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.52% | 2.41% | +0.11% |
Volatility
IJK vs. IJH - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK) has a higher volatility of 5.79% compared to iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) at 4.87%. This indicates that IJK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IJH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IJK | IJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.79% | 4.87% | +0.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.78% | 11.71% | +2.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.52% | 15.84% | +1.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.78% | 19.77% | +1.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.11% | 21.20% | -0.09% |
IJK vs. IJH - Expense Ratio Comparison
IJK has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than IJH's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IJK vs. IJH - Dividend Comparison
IJK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than IJH's 1.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 1.17% | 1.36% | 1.33% | 1.46% | 1.68% | 1.18% | 1.28% | 1.63% | 1.72% | 1.19% | 1.60% | 1.56% |
IJK iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF | 0.53% | 0.66% | 0.79% | 1.13% | 1.08% | 0.50% | 0.70% | 1.09% | 1.13% | 0.93% | 1.15% | 1.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, IJK and IJH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IJK has higher volatility (5.79%) compared to IJH (4.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJK dropped -54.47% vs IJH's -55.07%.
On 10-year performance, IJK leads with 11.71% vs 11.43% for IJH. On fees, IJH is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, IJH has been the lower-risk option at 4.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IJK has performed better with a 11.71% return vs 11.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IJH is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for IJK.
IJH has the higher dividend yield at 1.17%, compared with 0.53% for IJK.
IJK is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while IJH is Mid Cap Blend Equities. IJK tracks S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index, while IJH tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for IJK and 0.05% for IJH.
IJK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IJK and IJH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer