PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IJK vs. IJH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IJK vs. IJH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK) and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJK achieves a 19.65% return, which is significantly higher than IJH's 15.37% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IJK having a 11.71% annualized return and IJH not far behind at 11.43%.


IJK

1D
1.29%
1M
4.70%
YTD
19.65%
6M
18.04%
1Y
31.58%
3Y*
17.26%
5Y*
9.17%
10Y*
11.71%

IJH

1D
1.07%
1M
4.37%
YTD
15.37%
6M
13.91%
1Y
27.00%
3Y*
15.37%
5Y*
9.37%
10Y*
11.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJK vs. IJH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IJK
iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF
19.65%7.28%15.68%17.41%-19.03%18.68%22.45%25.96%-10.53%19.64%
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
15.37%7.42%13.92%16.40%-13.11%24.72%13.60%26.10%-11.19%16.26%

Correlation

The correlation between IJK and IJH is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2000

0.97

The correlation between IJK and IJH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

IJK vs. IJH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IJK
IJH

Industrials

30.2%
25.9%

Technology

24.8%
16.6%

Healthcare

13.7%
8.7%

Consumer Cyclical

7.5%
9.2%

Financial Services

6.7%
13.5%

Real Estate

5.3%
7.5%

Basic Materials

3.5%
4.9%

Energy

3.2%
5.3%

Utilities

2.0%
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

1.8%
4.2%

Communication Services

1.4%
1.0%

Industrials

IJK
30.2%
IJH
25.9%

Technology

IJK
24.8%
IJH
16.6%

Healthcare

IJK
13.7%
IJH
8.7%

Consumer Cyclical

IJK
7.5%
IJH
9.2%

Financial Services

IJK
6.7%
IJH
13.5%

Real Estate

IJK
5.3%
IJH
7.5%

Basic Materials

IJK
3.5%
IJH
4.9%

Energy

IJK
3.2%
IJH
5.3%

Utilities

IJK
2.0%
IJH
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

IJK
1.8%
IJH
4.2%

Communication Services

IJK
1.4%
IJH
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IJK vs. IJH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJK
IJK Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
IJK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJK Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
IJK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJK Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

IJH
IJH Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
IJH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJH Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
IJH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJH Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJK vs. IJH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK) and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IJKIJHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.30

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

3.07

+0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.55

11.23

+1.33

IJK vs. IJH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJK Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the IJH Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJK and IJH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IJK vs. IJH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJK drawdown since its inception was -54.47%, roughly equal to the maximum IJH drawdown of -55.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJK and IJH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IJKIJHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.47%

-55.07%

+0.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.92%

-8.83%

-1.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.63%

-24.10%

-1.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.24%

-24.10%

-5.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.25%

-42.18%

+2.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-0.50%

+0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.78%

-7.56%

-3.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

2.41%

+0.11%

Volatility

IJK vs. IJH - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK) has a higher volatility of 5.79% compared to iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) at 4.87%. This indicates that IJK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IJH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IJKIJHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.79%

4.87%

+0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.78%

11.71%

+2.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.52%

15.84%

+1.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.78%

19.77%

+1.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.11%

21.20%

-0.09%

IJK vs. IJH - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJK has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than IJH's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IJK vs. IJH - Dividend Comparison

IJK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than IJH's 1.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
1.17%1.36%1.33%1.46%1.68%1.18%1.28%1.63%1.72%1.19%1.60%1.56%
IJK
iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF
0.53%0.66%0.79%1.13%1.08%0.50%0.70%1.09%1.13%0.93%1.15%1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, IJK and IJH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IJK has higher volatility (5.79%) compared to IJH (4.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJK dropped -54.47% vs IJH's -55.07%.

On 10-year performance, IJK leads with 11.71% vs 11.43% for IJH. On fees, IJH is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, IJH has been the lower-risk option at 4.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IJK has performed better with a 11.71% return vs 11.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IJH is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for IJK.

IJH has the higher dividend yield at 1.17%, compared with 0.53% for IJK.

IJK is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while IJH is Mid Cap Blend Equities. IJK tracks S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index, while IJH tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for IJK and 0.05% for IJH.

IJK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJK and IJH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer