PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IJK vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IJK vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJK achieves a 20.35% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's 9.16% return. Over the past 10 years, IJK has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 12.03%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.88% annualized return.


IJK

1D
0.59%
1M
4.15%
YTD
20.35%
6M
17.46%
1Y
32.45%
3Y*
18.28%
5Y*
8.76%
10Y*
12.03%

^GSPC

1D
-0.37%
1M
-0.01%
YTD
9.16%
6M
8.64%
1Y
25.22%
3Y*
19.78%
5Y*
11.99%
10Y*
13.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJK vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IJK
iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF
20.35%7.28%15.68%17.41%-19.03%18.68%22.45%25.96%-10.53%19.64%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
9.16%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Correlation

The correlation between IJK and ^GSPC is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2000

0.88

The correlation between IJK and ^GSPC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IJK vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJK
IJK Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
IJK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJK Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
IJK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJK Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJK vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IJK^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.37

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.28

2.78

+0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.90

12.44

+0.46

IJK vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJK Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJK and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IJK vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJK drawdown since its inception was -54.47%, roughly equal to the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJK and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IJK^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.47%

-56.78%

+2.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.92%

-9.10%

-0.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.63%

-18.90%

-6.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.24%

-25.43%

-3.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.25%

-33.92%

-5.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.80%

+1.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.78%

-10.71%

-0.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

2.03%

+0.49%

Volatility

IJK vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK) has a higher volatility of 5.57% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 4.67%. This indicates that IJK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IJK^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.57%

4.67%

+0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.76%

9.84%

+3.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.56%

12.50%

+5.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.77%

16.99%

+3.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.11%

18.11%

+3.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IJK and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IJK has higher volatility (5.57%) compared to ^GSPC (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJK dropped -54.47% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJK and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer