PAMC vs. FCUS
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) and Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS).
PAMC and FCUS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PAMC is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Lunt Capital U.S. MidCap Multi-Factor Rotation Index. It was launched on Jun 24, 2020. FCUS is an actively managed fund by Pinnacle. It was launched on Dec 28, 2022.
Performance
PAMC vs. FCUS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PAMC vs. FCUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PAMC Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF | 2.88% | 1.54% | 26.20% | 19.30% |
FCUS Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF | 14.56% | 13.69% | 30.59% | 21.13% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAMC achieves a 2.88% return, which is significantly lower than FCUS's 14.56% return.
PAMC
- 1D
- 4.11%
- 1M
- -4.94%
- YTD
- 2.88%
- 6M
- 2.73%
- 1Y
- 14.36%
- 3Y*
- 13.95%
- 5Y*
- 7.11%
- 10Y*
- —
FCUS
- 1D
- 5.33%
- 1M
- -8.18%
- YTD
- 14.56%
- 6M
- 17.93%
- 1Y
- 63.71%
- 3Y*
- 24.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PAMC vs. FCUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
PAMC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than FCUS's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PAMC vs. FCUS — Risk / Return Rank
PAMC
FCUS
PAMC vs. FCUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) and Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PAMC | FCUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.67 | 1.84 | -1.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.08 | 2.22 | -1.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.32 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.09 | 3.51 | -2.43 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.20 | 11.65 | -7.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PAMC | FCUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 | 1.84 | -1.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.84 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between PAMC and FCUS is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PAMC vs. FCUS - Dividend Comparison
PAMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, less than FCUS's 3.78% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAMC Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF | 1.26% | 1.11% | 0.97% | 0.69% | 1.29% | 0.36% | 0.30% |
FCUS Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF | 3.78% | 4.33% | 11.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PAMC vs. FCUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAMC drawdown since its inception was -27.04%, smaller than the maximum FCUS drawdown of -39.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAMC and FCUS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAMC | FCUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.04% | -39.89% | +12.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.60% | -17.70% | +4.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.30% | -9.72% | +3.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.66% | -7.83% | +0.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.52% | 5.34% | -1.82% |
Volatility
PAMC vs. FCUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) is 9.01%, while Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS) has a volatility of 16.58%. This indicates that PAMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PAMC | FCUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.01% | 16.58% | -7.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.66% | 29.46% | -14.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.61% | 34.85% | -13.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.42% | 30.06% | -9.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.82% | 30.06% | -9.24% |