PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCUS vs. SPMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCUS vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCUS achieves a 14.79% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 21.07% return.


FCUS

1D
0.98%
1M
-9.18%
6M
-0.57%
YTD
14.79%
1Y
40.13%
3Y*
22.26%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
22.71%

SPMO

1D
0.29%
1M
-4.64%
6M
20.51%
YTD
21.07%
1Y
28.09%
3Y*
37.36%
5Y*
20.21%
10Y*
19.57%
ALL TIME*
18.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$898.65K$963.67K$1.11M
$331.54M$346.70M$350.59M

FCUS vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FCUS
Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF
14.79%13.69%30.59%21.13%0.87%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
21.07%26.58%45.82%17.56%0.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FCUS and SPMO is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2022

0.75

The correlation between FCUS and SPMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

FCUS vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FCUS
SPMO

Technology

50.3%
53.7%

Energy

22.8%
3.3%

Industrials

11.7%
11.2%

Basic Materials

10.9%
1.9%

Healthcare

2.6%
6.9%

Consumer Defensive

2.3%
4.2%

Communication Services

2.2%
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

2.1%
1.2%

Financial Services

-

6.0%

Real Estate

-

1.1%

Utilities

-

2.7%

Technology

FCUS
50.3%
SPMO
53.7%

Energy

FCUS
22.8%
SPMO
3.3%

Industrials

FCUS
11.7%
SPMO
11.2%

Basic Materials

FCUS
10.9%
SPMO
1.9%

Healthcare

FCUS
2.6%
SPMO
6.9%

Consumer Defensive

FCUS
2.3%
SPMO
4.2%

Communication Services

FCUS
2.2%
SPMO
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FCUS
2.1%
SPMO
1.2%

Financial Services

FCUS

-

SPMO
6.0%

Real Estate

FCUS

-

SPMO
1.1%

Utilities

FCUS

-

SPMO
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCUS vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FCUS
FCUS Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
FCUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCUS Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
FCUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCUS Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FCUS vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCUSSPMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.21

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.18

1.63

-0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.67

5.93

-1.27

FCUS vs. SPMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCUS Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is comparable to the SPMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCUS and SPMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCUS vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCUS drawdown since its inception was -39.89%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCUS and SPMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCUSSPMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.89%

-30.95%

-8.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.26%

-15.64%

-15.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.89%

-20.13%

-19.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.51%

-11.03%

-12.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.79%

-4.62%

-3.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.88%

4.29%

+3.59%

Volatility

FCUS vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison

Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS) has a higher volatility of 20.84% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) at 10.53%. This indicates that FCUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCUSSPMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.84%

10.53%

+10.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.76%

21.52%

+12.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.62%

23.90%

+17.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.09%

20.60%

+11.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.09%

20.92%

+11.17%

FCUS vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCUS has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCUS vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison

FCUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, more than SPMO's 0.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCUS
Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF
3.77%4.33%11.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.73%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCUS and SPMO have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCUS has higher volatility (20.84%) compared to SPMO (10.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCUS dropped -39.89% vs SPMO's -30.95%.

On 3-year performance, SPMO leads with 37.36% vs 22.26% for FCUS. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, SPMO has been the lower-risk option at 10.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 37.36% return vs 22.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for FCUS.

FCUS has the higher dividend yield at 3.77%, compared with 0.73% for SPMO.

FCUS is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while SPMO is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Pinnacle and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for FCUS and 0.13% for SPMO.

SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCUS and SPMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer