PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCUS vs. FFTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FCUS vs. FFTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS) and Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FCUS vs. FFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FCUS
Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF
14.56%13.69%30.59%21.13%
FFTY
Innovator IBD 50 ETF
-4.02%23.38%18.36%12.40%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCUS achieves a 14.56% return, which is significantly higher than FFTY's -4.02% return.


FCUS

1D
5.33%
1M
-8.18%
YTD
14.56%
6M
17.93%
1Y
63.71%
3Y*
24.55%
5Y*
10Y*

FFTY

1D
5.00%
1M
-18.29%
YTD
-4.02%
6M
-9.38%
1Y
25.53%
3Y*
13.29%
5Y*
-4.52%
10Y*
5.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FCUS vs. FFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCUS has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than FFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FCUS vs. FFTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCUS
FCUS Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FCUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FCUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCUS Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

FFTY
FFTY Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
FFTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFTY Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
FFTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFTY Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCUS vs. FFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS) and Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCUSFFTYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.84

0.74

+1.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.22

1.14

+1.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.15

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.51

1.04

+2.47

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.65

3.05

+8.61

FCUS vs. FFTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is higher than the FFTY Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCUS and FFTY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCUSFFTYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

0.74

+1.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.12

+0.71

Correlation

The correlation between FCUS and FFTY is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FCUS vs. FFTY - Dividend Comparison

FCUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, more than FFTY's 1.40% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCUS
Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF
3.78%4.33%11.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FFTY
Innovator IBD 50 ETF
1.40%1.35%0.91%0.65%2.75%0.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.17%

Drawdowns

FCUS vs. FFTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCUS drawdown since its inception was -39.89%, smaller than the maximum FFTY drawdown of -59.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCUS and FFTY.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FCUSFFTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.89%

-59.46%

+19.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.70%

-23.29%

+5.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.72%

-32.35%

+22.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.83%

-22.38%

+14.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.34%

7.97%

-2.63%

Volatility

FCUS vs. FFTY - Volatility Comparison

Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS) has a higher volatility of 16.58% compared to Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) at 14.46%. This indicates that FCUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FCUSFFTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.58%

14.46%

+2.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.46%

28.72%

+0.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.85%

34.49%

+0.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.06%

29.00%

+1.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.06%

27.17%

+2.89%