PALC vs. SCHG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PALC (Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - PALC tracks the Lunt Capital U.S. Large Cap Multi-Factor Rotation Index while SCHG tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PALC returned 9.43%/yr vs 13.27%/yr for SCHG. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PALC charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.

Performance

PALC vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PALC) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PALC achieves a 10.24% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 1.35% return.

PALC

• 1D: -2.85%
• 1M: 2.12%
• YTD: 10.24%
• 6M: 9.48%
• 1Y: 19.99%
• 3Y*: 16.40%
• 5Y*: 9.43%
• 10Y*: —

SCHG

• 1D: -1.37%
• 1M: -3.93%
• YTD: 1.35%
• 6M: 0.09%
• 1Y: 17.91%
• 3Y*: 22.13%
• 5Y*: 13.27%
• 10Y*: 18.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PALC vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
PALC Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF	10.24%	7.28%	21.24%	17.52%	-14.74%	41.03%	23.19%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	1.35%	17.50%	34.95%	50.10%	-31.80%	28.11%	28.78%

Correlation

The correlation between PALC and SCHG is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.75
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2020	0.77

The correlation between PALC and SCHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PALC vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PALC	SCHG
Healthcare	27.1%	8.4%
Technology	21.3%	46.7%
Industrials	15.8%	6.0%
Consumer Defensive	12.5%	1.6%
Financial Services	8.4%	6.6%
Consumer Cyclical	4.4%	12.4%
Energy	3.5%	0.7%
Basic Materials	2.4%	1.3%
Utilities	2.3%	0.4%
Communication Services	1.7%	15.3%
Real Estate	0.3%	0.5%

Return for Risk

PALC vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PALC

PALC Risk / Return Rank: 46
PALC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
PALC Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
PALC Omega Ratio Rank: 44
PALC Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
PALC Martin Ratio Rank: 51

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 28
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 30
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PALC vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PALC) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PALC	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	1.11	+0.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.10	1.56	+0.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.20	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.25	1.10	+1.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.15	3.58	+4.57

PALC vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PALC Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PALC and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PALC vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PALC drawdown since its inception was -24.45%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PALC and SCHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	PALC	SCHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.45%	-34.59%	+10.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.94%	-16.41%	+7.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.39%	-23.39%	+6.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.45%	-34.59%	+10.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.85%	-6.46%	+3.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.29%	-5.20%	-1.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.46%	5.02%	-2.56%

Volatility

PALC vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PALC) has a higher volatility of 7.41% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 5.91%. This indicates that PALC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PALC	SCHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.41%	5.91%	+1.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.87%	12.52%	-1.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.38%	16.24%	-2.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.47%	22.38%	-5.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.23%	21.58%	-4.35%

PALC vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PALC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

PALC vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

PALC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PALC Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF	1.06%	1.08%	0.93%	0.74%	1.69%	0.64%	0.72%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.38%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PALC and SCHG in my portfolio?

PALC and SCHG have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PALC or SCHG?

PALC has higher volatility (7.41%) compared to SCHG (5.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PALC dropped -24.45% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

Which ETF is better, PALC or SCHG?

On 5-year performance, SCHG leads with 13.27% vs 9.43% for PALC. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 5.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PALC or SCHG?

Over the 5-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 13.27% return vs 9.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PALC or SCHG?

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PALC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PALC or SCHG?

PALC has the higher dividend yield at 1.06%, compared with 0.38% for SCHG.

What is the main difference between PALC and SCHG?

PALC tracks Lunt Capital U.S. Large Cap Multi-Factor Rotation Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PALC and 0.04% for SCHG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PALC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.