PALC vs. QVMM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PALC (Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF) and QVMM (Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PALC is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Lunt Capital U.S. Large Cap Multi-Factor Rotation Index, while QVMM is a Multi-factor fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Quality, Value & Momentum Top 90% Multi-Factor Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PALC returned 16.40%/yr vs 16.66%/yr for QVMM. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PALC charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QVMM.

Performance

PALC vs. QVMM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PALC) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PALC achieves a 10.24% return, which is significantly lower than QVMM's 15.32% return.

PALC

• 1D: -2.85%
• 1M: 2.12%
• YTD: 10.24%
• 6M: 9.48%
• 1Y: 19.99%
• 3Y*: 16.40%
• 5Y*: 9.43%
• 10Y*: —

QVMM

• 1D: -0.92%
• 1M: 2.93%
• YTD: 15.32%
• 6M: 13.35%
• 1Y: 26.52%
• 3Y*: 16.66%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PALC vs. QVMM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PALC Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF	10.24%	7.28%	21.24%	17.52%	-14.74%	8.87%
QVMM Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF	15.32%	8.82%	13.36%	15.43%	-13.06%	6.20%

Correlation

The correlation between PALC and QVMM is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021	0.78

The correlation between PALC and QVMM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

PALC vs. QVMM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PALC	QVMM
Healthcare	27.1%	9.2%
Technology	21.3%	15.6%
Industrials	15.8%	26.1%
Consumer Defensive	12.5%	3.6%
Financial Services	8.4%	14.7%
Consumer Cyclical	4.4%	9.8%
Energy	3.5%	4.9%
Basic Materials	2.4%	4.8%
Utilities	2.3%	3.2%
Communication Services	1.7%	0.8%
Real Estate	0.3%	7.4%

Return for Risk

PALC vs. QVMM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PALC

PALC Risk / Return Rank: 46
PALC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
PALC Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
PALC Omega Ratio Rank: 44
PALC Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
PALC Martin Ratio Rank: 51

QVMM

QVMM Risk / Return Rank: 59
QVMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
QVMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
QVMM Omega Ratio Rank: 51
QVMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
QVMM Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PALC vs. QVMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PALC) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PALC	QVMM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	1.71	-0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.10	2.50	-0.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.30	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.25	3.21	-0.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.15	11.53	-3.38

PALC vs. QVMM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PALC Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the QVMM Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PALC and QVMM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PALC vs. QVMM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PALC drawdown since its inception was -24.45%, roughly equal to the maximum QVMM drawdown of -24.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PALC and QVMM.

Drawdown Indicators

	PALC	QVMM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.45%	-24.00%	-0.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.94%	-8.30%	-0.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.39%	-24.00%	+6.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.45%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.85%	-0.92%	-1.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.29%	-7.01%	+0.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.46%	2.31%	+0.15%

Volatility

PALC vs. QVMM - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PALC) has a higher volatility of 7.41% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM) at 4.58%. This indicates that PALC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QVMM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PALC	QVMM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.41%	4.58%	+2.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.87%	11.61%	-0.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.38%	15.58%	-2.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.47%	19.46%	-2.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.23%	19.46%	-2.23%

PALC vs. QVMM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PALC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than QVMM's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

PALC vs. QVMM - Dividend Comparison

PALC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than QVMM's 1.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
PALC Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF	1.06%	1.08%	0.93%	0.74%	1.69%	0.64%	0.72%
QVMM Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF	1.15%	1.32%	1.29%	1.42%	1.51%	0.60%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PALC and QVMM in my portfolio?

PALC and QVMM have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PALC or QVMM?

PALC has higher volatility (7.41%) compared to QVMM (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PALC dropped -24.45% vs QVMM's -24.00%.

Which ETF is better, PALC or QVMM?

On 3-year performance, QVMM leads with 16.66% vs 16.40% for PALC. On fees, QVMM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QVMM has been the lower-risk option at 4.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PALC or QVMM?

Over the 3-year period, QVMM has performed better with a 16.66% return vs 16.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PALC or QVMM?

QVMM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PALC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PALC or QVMM?

QVMM has the higher dividend yield at 1.15%, compared with 1.06% for PALC.

What is the main difference between PALC and QVMM?

PALC is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QVMM is Multi-factor. PALC tracks Lunt Capital U.S. Large Cap Multi-Factor Rotation Index, while QVMM tracks S&P MidCap 400 Quality, Value & Momentum Top 90% Multi-Factor Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PALC and 0.15% for QVMM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QVMM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.