OZEM vs. MNST

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Roundhill Glp-1 & Weight Loss ETF (OZEM) and Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST).

OZEM is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on May 20, 2024.

Performance

OZEM vs. MNST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Glp-1 & Weight Loss ETF (OZEM) and Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

OZEM vs. MNST - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
OZEM Roundhill Glp-1 & Weight Loss ETF	-8.66%	41.87%	-3.78%
MNST Monster Beverage Corporation	-5.49%	45.87%	-1.54%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OZEM achieves a -8.66% return, which is significantly lower than MNST's -5.49% return.

OZEM

• 1D: 3.13%
• 1M: -7.94%
• YTD: -8.66%
• 6M: 15.54%
• 1Y: 33.42%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MNST

• 1D: 1.60%
• 1M: -15.05%
• YTD: -5.49%
• 6M: 7.65%
• 1Y: 23.82%
• 3Y*: 10.29%
• 5Y*: 9.67%
• 10Y*: 12.42%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

OZEM vs. MNST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OZEM

OZEM Risk / Return Rank: 64
OZEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
OZEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
OZEM Omega Ratio Rank: 59
OZEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
OZEM Martin Ratio Rank: 51

MNST

MNST Risk / Return Rank: 73
MNST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
MNST Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
MNST Omega Ratio Rank: 69
MNST Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
MNST Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OZEM vs. MNST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Glp-1 & Weight Loss ETF (OZEM) and Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	OZEM	MNST	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.22	1.04	+0.18
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.76	1.53	+0.24
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.20	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.78	1.43	+0.35
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.85	5.21	-0.36
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

OZEM vs. MNST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OZEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is comparable to the MNST Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OZEM and MNST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	OZEM	MNST	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.22	1.04	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.41	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.48	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	0.59	-0.09

Correlation

The correlation between OZEM and MNST is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

OZEM vs. MNST - Dividend Comparison

OZEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, while MNST has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024
OZEM Roundhill Glp-1 & Weight Loss ETF	1.31%	1.20%	0.22%
MNST Monster Beverage Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

OZEM vs. MNST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OZEM drawdown since its inception was -28.65%, smaller than the maximum MNST drawdown of -69.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OZEM and MNST.

Drawdown Indicators

	OZEM	MNST	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.65%	-69.17%	+40.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.11%	-17.70%	-1.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.62%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-30.42%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.70%	-16.39%	+0.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.30%	-20.76%	+12.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.02%	4.84%	+2.18%

Volatility

OZEM vs. MNST - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Glp-1 & Weight Loss ETF (OZEM) and Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) have volatilities of 6.60% and 6.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OZEM	MNST	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.60%	6.66%	-0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.54%	16.11%	+1.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.62%	23.11%	+4.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.37%	23.76%	+1.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.37%	26.17%	-0.80%