OZEM vs. HRTS
OZEM (Roundhill Glp-1 & Weight Loss ETF) and HRTS (Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, OZEM returned 22.91% vs 20.02% for HRTS. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OZEM charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for HRTS.
Performance
OZEM vs. HRTS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OZEM achieves a -11.30% return, which is significantly lower than HRTS's -6.17% return.
OZEM
- 1D
- -2.68%
- 1M
- -3.32%
- YTD
- -11.30%
- 6M
- -4.49%
- 1Y
- 22.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HRTS
- 1D
- -2.01%
- 1M
- -1.29%
- YTD
- -6.17%
- 6M
- -4.81%
- 1Y
- 20.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OZEM vs. HRTS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
OZEM Roundhill Glp-1 & Weight Loss ETF | -11.30% | 41.87% | -3.78% |
HRTS Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF | -6.17% | 23.93% | -10.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between OZEM and HRTS is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2024 | 0.77 |
The correlation between OZEM and HRTS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
OZEM vs. HRTS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OZEM
HRTS
Healthcare
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
OZEM
HRTS
Financial Services
OZEM
HRTS
-
Basic Materials
OZEM
-
HRTS
-
Communication Services
OZEM
-
HRTS
-
Consumer Cyclical
OZEM
-
HRTS
-
Consumer Defensive
OZEM
-
HRTS
-
Energy
OZEM
-
HRTS
-
Industrials
OZEM
-
HRTS
-
Real Estate
OZEM
-
HRTS
-
Technology
OZEM
-
HRTS
-
Utilities
OZEM
-
HRTS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OZEM vs. HRTS — Risk / Return Rank
OZEM
HRTS
OZEM vs. HRTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Glp-1 & Weight Loss ETF (OZEM) and Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF (HRTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OZEM | HRTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.94 | 1.25 | -0.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.43 | 1.91 | -0.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.22 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.26 | 1.89 | -0.64 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.64 | 4.83 | -2.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OZEM | HRTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 1.25 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.54 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
OZEM vs. HRTS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OZEM drawdown since its inception was -28.65%, which is greater than HRTS's maximum drawdown of -25.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OZEM and HRTS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OZEM | HRTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.65% | -25.81% | -2.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.16% | -11.01% | -8.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.14% | -9.59% | -8.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.88% | -9.02% | +0.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.14% | 4.32% | +4.82% |
Volatility
OZEM vs. HRTS - Volatility Comparison
Roundhill Glp-1 & Weight Loss ETF (OZEM) has a higher volatility of 5.65% compared to Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF (HRTS) at 4.40%. This indicates that OZEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HRTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OZEM | HRTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.65% | 4.40% | +1.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.28% | 11.32% | +5.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.46% | 16.04% | +8.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.05% | 19.09% | +5.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.05% | 19.09% | +5.96% |
OZEM vs. HRTS - Expense Ratio Comparison
OZEM has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than HRTS's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
OZEM vs. HRTS - Dividend Comparison
OZEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, less than HRTS's 1.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
HRTS Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF | 1.43% | 1.34% | 1.63% |
OZEM Roundhill Glp-1 & Weight Loss ETF | 1.35% | 1.20% | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OZEM and HRTS have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OZEM has higher volatility (5.65%) compared to HRTS (4.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OZEM dropped -28.65% vs HRTS's -25.81%.
On 1-year performance, OZEM leads with 22.91% vs 20.02% for HRTS. On fees, OZEM is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, HRTS has been the lower-risk option at 4.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, OZEM has performed better with a 22.91% return vs 20.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OZEM is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for HRTS.
HRTS has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 1.35% for OZEM.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Tema. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for OZEM and 0.75% for HRTS.
HRTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OZEM and HRTS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer