PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
OZEM vs. HRTS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between OZEM and HRTS is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.7

Performance

OZEM vs. HRTS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Glp-1 & Weight Loss ETF (OZEM) and Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF (HRTS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-10.46%
-10.22%
OZEM
HRTS

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

OZEM:

22.40%

HRTS:

19.34%

Max Drawdown

OZEM:

-19.84%

HRTS:

-18.97%

Current Drawdown

OZEM:

-11.63%

HRTS:

-13.12%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OZEM achieves a 5.09% return, which is significantly lower than HRTS's 6.48% return.


OZEM

YTD

5.09%

1M

7.38%

6M

-10.45%

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

HRTS

YTD

6.48%

1M

5.24%

6M

-10.22%

1Y

-4.12%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


OZEM vs. HRTS - Expense Ratio Comparison

OZEM has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than HRTS's 0.75% expense ratio.


HRTS
Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF
Expense ratio chart for HRTS: current value at 0.75% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.75%
Expense ratio chart for OZEM: current value at 0.59% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.59%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

OZEM vs. HRTS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OZEM

HRTS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HRTS is 44
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HRTS is 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HRTS is 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HRTS is 44
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HRTS is 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HRTS is 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

OZEM vs. HRTS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Glp-1 & Weight Loss ETF (OZEM) and Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF (HRTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
No data
OZEM
HRTS


Chart placeholderNot enough data

Dividends

OZEM vs. HRTS - Dividend Comparison

OZEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than HRTS's 1.53% yield.


TTM2024
OZEM
Roundhill Glp-1 & Weight Loss ETF
0.21%0.22%
HRTS
Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF
1.53%1.62%

Drawdowns

OZEM vs. HRTS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OZEM drawdown since its inception was -19.84%, roughly equal to the maximum HRTS drawdown of -18.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OZEM and HRTS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-11.63%
-13.12%
OZEM
HRTS

Volatility

OZEM vs. HRTS - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Glp-1 & Weight Loss ETF (OZEM) has a higher volatility of 5.08% compared to Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF (HRTS) at 4.06%. This indicates that OZEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HRTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
5.08%
4.06%
OZEM
HRTS
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab