PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OZEM vs. HRTS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OZEM vs. HRTS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Glp-1 & Weight Loss ETF (OZEM) and Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF (HRTS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OZEM achieves a -11.95% return, which is significantly lower than HRTS's -5.70% return.


OZEM

1D
-0.73%
1M
-4.02%
YTD
-11.95%
6M
-5.58%
1Y
21.16%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HRTS

1D
0.51%
1M
-0.90%
YTD
-5.70%
6M
-5.48%
1Y
20.97%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OZEM vs. HRTS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
OZEM
Roundhill Glp-1 & Weight Loss ETF
-11.95%41.87%-3.78%
HRTS
Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF
-5.70%23.93%-10.23%

Correlation

The correlation between OZEM and HRTS is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2024

0.77

The correlation between OZEM and HRTS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

OZEM vs. HRTS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
OZEM
HRTS

Healthcare

100.0%
100.0%

Financial Services

0.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

OZEM
100.0%
HRTS
100.0%

Financial Services

OZEM
0.1%
HRTS

-

Basic Materials

OZEM

-

HRTS

-

Communication Services

OZEM

-

HRTS

-

Consumer Cyclical

OZEM

-

HRTS

-

Consumer Defensive

OZEM

-

HRTS

-

Energy

OZEM

-

HRTS

-

Industrials

OZEM

-

HRTS

-

Real Estate

OZEM

-

HRTS

-

Technology

OZEM

-

HRTS

-

Utilities

OZEM

-

HRTS

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OZEM vs. HRTS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OZEM
OZEM Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
OZEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OZEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
OZEM Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
OZEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
OZEM Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

HRTS
HRTS Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
HRTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HRTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
HRTS Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
HRTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
HRTS Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OZEM vs. HRTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Glp-1 & Weight Loss ETF (OZEM) and Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF (HRTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OZEMHRTSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.87

1.31

-0.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.34

1.99

-0.65

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.23

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

1.91

-0.80

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.30

4.83

-2.53

OZEM vs. HRTS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OZEM Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is lower than the HRTS Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OZEM and HRTS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OZEMHRTSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

1.31

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.55

-0.17

Drawdowns

OZEM vs. HRTS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OZEM drawdown since its inception was -28.65%, which is greater than HRTS's maximum drawdown of -25.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OZEM and HRTS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OZEMHRTSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.65%

-25.81%

-2.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.16%

-11.01%

-8.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.74%

-9.14%

-9.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.90%

-9.02%

+0.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.22%

4.36%

+4.86%

Volatility

OZEM vs. HRTS - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Glp-1 & Weight Loss ETF (OZEM) has a higher volatility of 5.67% compared to Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF (HRTS) at 4.44%. This indicates that OZEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HRTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OZEMHRTSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.67%

4.44%

+1.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.15%

11.26%

+5.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.46%

16.03%

+8.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.04%

19.07%

+5.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.04%

19.07%

+5.97%

OZEM vs. HRTS - Expense Ratio Comparison

OZEM has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than HRTS's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

OZEM vs. HRTS - Dividend Comparison

OZEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than HRTS's 1.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
HRTS
Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF
1.42%1.34%1.63%
OZEM
Roundhill Glp-1 & Weight Loss ETF
1.36%1.20%0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


OZEM and HRTS have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OZEM has higher volatility (5.67%) compared to HRTS (4.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OZEM dropped -28.65% vs HRTS's -25.81%.

On 1-year performance, OZEM leads with 21.16% vs 20.97% for HRTS. On fees, OZEM is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, HRTS has been the lower-risk option at 4.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, OZEM has performed better with a 21.16% return vs 20.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OZEM is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for HRTS.

HRTS has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 1.36% for OZEM.

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Tema. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for OZEM and 0.75% for HRTS.

HRTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OZEM and HRTS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer