OZEM vs. WMT

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

OZEM (Roundhill Glp-1 & Weight Loss ETF) is Health & Biotech Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while WMT (Walmart Inc.) is a stock. Over the past year, OZEM returned 32.51% vs 13.85% for WMT. Their 0.12 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

OZEM vs. WMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Glp-1 & Weight Loss ETF (OZEM) and Walmart Inc. (WMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OZEM achieves a -7.04% return, which is significantly lower than WMT's 0.21% return.

OZEM

• 1D: -2.34%
• 1M: -5.35%
• 6M: -11.60%
• YTD: -7.04%
• 1Y: 32.51%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.44%

WMT

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: -0.57%
• 6M: -6.30%
• YTD: 0.21%
• 1Y: 13.85%
• 3Y*: 29.39%
• 5Y*: 20.06%
• 10Y*: 18.40%
• ALL TIME*: 18.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
OZEM Roundhill Glp-1 & Weight Loss ETF	$377.67K	$656.35K	$729.31K
WMT Walmart Inc.	$2.47B	$2.41B	$2.70B

OZEM vs. WMT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
OZEM Roundhill Glp-1 & Weight Loss ETF	-7.04%	41.87%	-3.85%
WMT Walmart Inc.	0.21%	24.49%	41.49%

Correlation

The correlation between OZEM and WMT is -0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2024	0.12

The correlation between OZEM and WMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

OZEM vs. WMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

OZEM

OZEM Risk / Return Rank: 52
OZEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
OZEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
OZEM Omega Ratio Rank: 56
OZEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
OZEM Martin Ratio Rank: 34

WMT

WMT Risk / Return Rank: 62
WMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
WMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
WMT Omega Ratio Rank: 58
WMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
WMT Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

OZEM vs. WMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Glp-1 & Weight Loss ETF (OZEM) and Walmart Inc. (WMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OZEM	WMT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.42	0.59	+0.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.08	0.99	+1.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.12	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.71	0.75	+0.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.34	1.96	+1.39

OZEM vs. WMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OZEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is higher than the WMT Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OZEM and WMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

OZEM vs. WMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OZEM drawdown since its inception was -28.65%, smaller than the maximum WMT drawdown of -77.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OZEM and WMT.

Drawdown Indicators

	OZEM	WMT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.65%	-77.14%	+48.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.50%	-19.23%	-0.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-21.93%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.74%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-25.74%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.20%	-17.14%	+2.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.24%	-14.63%	+5.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.95%	7.39%	+2.56%

Volatility

OZEM vs. WMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill Glp-1 & Weight Loss ETF (OZEM) is 5.88%, while Walmart Inc. (WMT) has a volatility of 6.81%. This indicates that OZEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OZEM	WMT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.88%	6.81%	-0.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.84%	19.61%	-2.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.63%	24.77%	-1.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.82%	21.96%	+2.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.82%	21.90%	+2.92%

Dividends

OZEM vs. WMT - Dividend Comparison

OZEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, more than WMT's 0.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
OZEM Roundhill Glp-1 & Weight Loss ETF	1.29%	1.20%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WMT Walmart Inc.	0.87%	0.84%	0.92%	1.45%	1.58%	1.52%	1.50%	1.78%	2.23%	2.07%	2.89%	3.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OZEM and WMT in my portfolio?

OZEM and WMT have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OZEM or WMT?

WMT has higher volatility (6.81%) compared to OZEM (5.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OZEM dropped -28.65% vs WMT's -77.14%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OZEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.