OWSMX vs. FGIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Old Westbury Small & Mid Cap Strategies Fund (OWSMX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX).
OWSMX is managed by Old Westbury. It was launched on Apr 4, 2005. FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007.
Performance
OWSMX vs. FGIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
OWSMX vs. FGIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OWSMX Old Westbury Small & Mid Cap Strategies Fund | 1.26% | 18.06% | 7.76% | 11.67% | -22.54% | 4.10% | 22.11% | 24.52% | -12.04% | 18.20% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 10.36% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OWSMX achieves a 1.26% return, which is significantly lower than FGIAX's 10.36% return. Over the past 10 years, OWSMX has underperformed FGIAX with an annualized return of 7.14%, while FGIAX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.78% annualized return.
OWSMX
- 1D
- 3.04%
- 1M
- -8.32%
- YTD
- 1.26%
- 6M
- 4.07%
- 1Y
- 20.61%
- 3Y*
- 11.21%
- 5Y*
- 2.32%
- 10Y*
- 7.14%
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -2.77%
- YTD
- 10.36%
- 6M
- 10.94%
- 1Y
- 21.22%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 10.46%
- 10Y*
- 8.78%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
OWSMX vs. FGIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
OWSMX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FGIAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
OWSMX vs. FGIAX — Risk / Return Rank
OWSMX
FGIAX
OWSMX vs. FGIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Old Westbury Small & Mid Cap Strategies Fund (OWSMX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OWSMX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.32 | 1.79 | -0.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.90 | 2.30 | -0.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.36 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | 2.73 | -1.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.30 | 12.62 | -6.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OWSMX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | 1.79 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | 0.80 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.58 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.42 | +0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between OWSMX and FGIAX is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
OWSMX vs. FGIAX - Dividend Comparison
OWSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.30%, less than FGIAX's 9.05% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OWSMX Old Westbury Small & Mid Cap Strategies Fund | 8.30% | 8.41% | 3.92% | 0.65% | 0.52% | 6.04% | 3.23% | 4.65% | 12.54% | 7.43% | 6.32% | 10.79% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.05% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
Drawdowns
OWSMX vs. FGIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OWSMX drawdown since its inception was -38.35%, smaller than the maximum FGIAX drawdown of -49.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OWSMX and FGIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| OWSMX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.35% | -49.35% | +11.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.67% | -8.29% | -3.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.57% | -21.08% | -13.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.96% | -38.02% | +2.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.98% | -3.06% | -5.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.23% | -7.22% | -1.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | 1.79% | +1.21% |
Volatility
OWSMX vs. FGIAX - Volatility Comparison
Old Westbury Small & Mid Cap Strategies Fund (OWSMX) has a higher volatility of 6.48% compared to Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) at 4.15%. This indicates that OWSMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| OWSMX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.48% | 4.15% | +2.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.62% | 7.07% | +3.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.07% | 12.28% | +3.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.15% | 13.08% | +3.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.35% | 15.17% | +1.18% |