PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OWSMX vs. OWMBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OWSMX vs. OWMBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Old Westbury Small & Mid Cap Strategies Fund (OWSMX) and Old Westbury Municipal Bond Fund (OWMBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OWSMX achieves a 11.14% return, which is significantly higher than OWMBX's 0.37% return. Over the past 10 years, OWSMX has outperformed OWMBX with an annualized return of 7.75%, while OWMBX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.42% annualized return.


OWSMX

1D
-0.57%
1M
2.22%
YTD
11.14%
6M
13.54%
1Y
22.56%
3Y*
14.95%
5Y*
3.67%
10Y*
7.75%

OWMBX

1D
0.09%
1M
0.35%
YTD
0.37%
6M
0.67%
1Y
4.46%
3Y*
2.73%
5Y*
0.65%
10Y*
1.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OWSMX vs. OWMBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OWSMX
Old Westbury Small & Mid Cap Strategies Fund
11.14%18.06%7.76%11.67%-22.54%4.10%22.11%24.52%-12.04%18.20%
OWMBX
Old Westbury Municipal Bond Fund
0.37%4.29%0.43%4.03%-5.39%-0.63%5.01%5.58%0.87%2.22%

Correlation

The correlation between OWSMX and OWMBX is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2005

-0.09

The correlation between OWSMX and OWMBX shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OWSMX vs. OWMBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OWSMX
OWSMX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
OWSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OWSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
OWSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
OWSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
OWSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

OWMBX
OWMBX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
OWMBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OWMBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
OWMBX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
OWMBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
OWMBX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OWSMX vs. OWMBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Old Westbury Small & Mid Cap Strategies Fund (OWSMX) and Old Westbury Municipal Bond Fund (OWMBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OWSMXOWMBXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.73

2.64

-0.91

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.49

3.88

-1.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.72

-0.39

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.04

2.07

-0.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.96

5.93

+2.04

OWSMX vs. OWMBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OWSMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is lower than the OWMBX Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OWSMX and OWMBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OWSMXOWMBXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73

2.64

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.22

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.47

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

1.05

-0.52

Drawdowns

OWSMX vs. OWMBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OWSMX drawdown since its inception was -38.35%, which is greater than OWMBX's maximum drawdown of -9.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OWSMX and OWMBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OWSMXOWMBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.35%

-9.54%

-28.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.67%

-2.45%

-9.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.97%

-3.81%

-12.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.57%

-9.37%

-25.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.96%

-9.44%

-26.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.72%

-1.25%

+0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.18%

-1.64%

-6.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

0.80%

+2.19%

Volatility

OWSMX vs. OWMBX - Volatility Comparison

Old Westbury Small & Mid Cap Strategies Fund (OWSMX) has a higher volatility of 3.95% compared to Old Westbury Municipal Bond Fund (OWMBX) at 0.65%. This indicates that OWSMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OWMBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OWSMXOWMBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.95%

0.65%

+3.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.80%

1.44%

+9.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.55%

1.92%

+11.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.18%

3.11%

+13.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.43%

3.04%

+13.39%

OWSMX vs. OWMBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OWSMX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than OWMBX's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

OWSMX vs. OWMBX - Dividend Comparison

OWSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.57%, more than OWMBX's 2.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OWMBX
Old Westbury Municipal Bond Fund
2.61%2.61%2.54%2.01%1.15%2.06%2.55%1.68%1.45%1.18%1.61%1.40%
OWSMX
Old Westbury Small & Mid Cap Strategies Fund
7.57%8.41%3.92%0.65%0.52%6.04%3.23%4.65%12.54%7.43%6.32%10.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


OWSMX and OWMBX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OWSMX has higher volatility (3.95%) compared to OWMBX (0.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OWSMX dropped -38.35% vs OWMBX's -9.54%.

OWMBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OWSMX and OWMBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer