OUSM vs. SCHA
OUSM (OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF) and SCHA (Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - OUSM tracks the O'Shares US Small-Cap Quality Dividend Index while SCHA tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, OUSM returned 7.38%/yr vs 7.31%/yr for SCHA. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. OUSM charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHA.
Performance
OUSM vs. SCHA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OUSM achieves a 6.78% return, which is significantly lower than SCHA's 20.80% return.
OUSM
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.65%
- YTD
- 6.78%
- 6M
- 7.11%
- 1Y
- 11.41%
- 3Y*
- 12.07%
- 5Y*
- 7.38%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHA
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- 3.65%
- YTD
- 20.80%
- 6M
- 19.63%
- 1Y
- 41.92%
- 3Y*
- 19.74%
- 5Y*
- 7.31%
- 10Y*
- 11.12%
OUSM vs. SCHA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OUSM OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF | 6.78% | 2.17% | 13.45% | 18.82% | -7.89% | 21.45% | 7.64% | 28.04% | -10.60% | 10.85% |
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 20.80% | 11.60% | 11.16% | 18.46% | -19.81% | 16.45% | 19.34% | 26.50% | -11.79% | 14.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between OUSM and SCHA is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017 | 0.90 |
The correlation between OUSM and SCHA shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
OUSM vs. SCHA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OUSM
SCHA
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Real Estate
-
Industrials
OUSM
SCHA
Financial Services
OUSM
SCHA
Consumer Cyclical
OUSM
SCHA
Technology
OUSM
SCHA
Healthcare
OUSM
SCHA
Consumer Defensive
OUSM
SCHA
Utilities
OUSM
SCHA
Communication Services
OUSM
SCHA
Basic Materials
OUSM
SCHA
Energy
OUSM
SCHA
Real Estate
OUSM
-
SCHA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OUSM vs. SCHA — Risk / Return Rank
OUSM
SCHA
OUSM vs. SCHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OUSM | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.39 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.24 | 4.43 | -3.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.64 | 16.30 | -12.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OUSM | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 | 2.35 | -1.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.33 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.58 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
OUSM vs. SCHA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OUSM drawdown since its inception was -39.84%, smaller than the maximum SCHA drawdown of -42.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OUSM and SCHA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OUSM | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.84% | -42.41% | +2.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.21% | -9.50% | +0.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.44% | -27.29% | +7.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.44% | -30.79% | +11.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.69% | 0.00% | -1.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.22% | -7.58% | +2.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 2.58% | +0.56% |
Volatility
OUSM vs. SCHA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) is 3.53%, while Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) has a volatility of 4.81%. This indicates that OUSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OUSM | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.53% | 4.81% | -1.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.25% | 12.84% | -3.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.12% | 17.96% | -4.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.30% | 21.94% | -5.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.94% | 22.71% | -3.77% |
OUSM vs. SCHA - Expense Ratio Comparison
OUSM has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHA's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
OUSM vs. SCHA - Dividend Comparison
OUSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, more than SCHA's 0.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OUSM OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF | 2.07% | 2.09% | 1.62% | 1.64% | 1.98% | 1.55% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 2.63% | 2.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 0.99% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.42% | 1.37% | 1.19% | 1.05% | 1.39% | 1.58% | 1.24% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OUSM and SCHA have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHA has higher volatility (4.81%) compared to OUSM (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OUSM dropped -39.84% vs SCHA's -42.41%.
On 5-year performance, OUSM leads with 7.38% vs 7.31% for SCHA. On fees, SCHA is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, OUSM has been the lower-risk option at 3.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, OUSM has performed better with a 7.38% return vs 7.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHA is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for OUSM.
OUSM has the higher dividend yield at 2.07%, compared with 0.99% for SCHA.
OUSM tracks O'Shares US Small-Cap Quality Dividend Index, while SCHA tracks Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: O'Shares Investments and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for OUSM and 0.04% for SCHA.
SCHA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OUSM and SCHA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer