OUSM vs. OGIG
OUSM (OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF) and OGIG (O’Shares Global Internet Giants ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OUSM is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the O'Shares US Small-Cap Quality Dividend Index, while OGIG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the O’Shares Global Internet Giants Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, OUSM returned 7.39%/yr vs -2.07%/yr for OGIG. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.48% expense ratio.
Performance
OUSM vs. OGIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OUSM achieves a 6.80% return, which is significantly higher than OGIG's -9.21% return.
OUSM
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 1.69%
- YTD
- 6.80%
- 6M
- 6.94%
- 1Y
- 10.89%
- 3Y*
- 11.71%
- 5Y*
- 7.39%
- 10Y*
- —
OGIG
- 1D
- -3.46%
- 1M
- 6.90%
- YTD
- -9.21%
- 6M
- -10.93%
- 1Y
- -6.52%
- 3Y*
- 15.13%
- 5Y*
- -2.07%
- 10Y*
- —
OUSM vs. OGIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OUSM OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF | 6.80% | 2.17% | 13.45% | 18.82% | -7.89% | 21.45% | 7.64% | 28.04% | -12.59% |
OGIG O’Shares Global Internet Giants ETF | -9.21% | 14.39% | 25.97% | 50.25% | -50.64% | -9.30% | 107.92% | 36.90% | -24.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between OUSM and OGIG is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2018 | 0.52 |
Over the past year, the correlation between OUSM and OGIG has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
OUSM vs. OGIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OUSM
OGIG
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
OUSM
OGIG
Financial Services
OUSM
OGIG
Consumer Cyclical
OUSM
OGIG
Technology
OUSM
OGIG
Healthcare
OUSM
OGIG
Consumer Defensive
OUSM
OGIG
-
Utilities
OUSM
OGIG
-
Communication Services
OUSM
OGIG
Basic Materials
OUSM
OGIG
-
Energy
OUSM
OGIG
-
Real Estate
OUSM
-
OGIG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OUSM vs. OGIG — Risk / Return Rank
OUSM
OGIG
OUSM vs. OGIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) and O’Shares Global Internet Giants ETF (OGIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OUSM | OGIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 0.97 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.19 | -0.20 | +1.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.47 | -0.41 | +3.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OUSM | OGIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | -0.30 | +1.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | -0.07 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.27 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
OUSM vs. OGIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OUSM drawdown since its inception was -39.84%, smaller than the maximum OGIG drawdown of -66.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OUSM and OGIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OUSM | OGIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.84% | -66.05% | +26.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.21% | -33.23% | +24.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.44% | -33.23% | +13.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.44% | -62.79% | +43.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.67% | -24.99% | +23.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.22% | -25.67% | +20.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 15.84% | -12.70% |
Volatility
OUSM vs. OGIG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) is 3.66%, while O’Shares Global Internet Giants ETF (OGIG) has a volatility of 8.15%. This indicates that OUSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OGIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OUSM | OGIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.66% | 8.15% | -4.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.25% | 18.28% | -9.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.15% | 22.16% | -9.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.30% | 31.58% | -15.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.94% | 31.03% | -12.09% |
OUSM vs. OGIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both OUSM and OGIG have an expense ratio of 0.48%.
Dividends
OUSM vs. OGIG - Dividend Comparison
OUSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, more than OGIG's 0.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OGIG O’Shares Global Internet Giants ETF | 0.08% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OUSM OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF | 2.07% | 2.09% | 1.62% | 1.64% | 1.98% | 1.55% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 2.63% | 2.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OUSM and OGIG have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OGIG has higher volatility (8.15%) compared to OUSM (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OUSM dropped -39.84% vs OGIG's -66.05%.
On 5-year performance, OUSM leads with 7.39% vs -2.07% for OGIG. Both ETFs have the same 0.48% expense ratio. On volatility, OUSM has been the lower-risk option at 3.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, OUSM has performed better with a 7.39% return vs -2.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OUSM and OGIG have the same expense ratio: 0.48% per year.
OUSM has the higher dividend yield at 2.07%, compared with 0.08% for OGIG.
OUSM is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while OGIG is Large Cap Growth Equities. OUSM tracks O'Shares US Small-Cap Quality Dividend Index, while OGIG tracks O’Shares Global Internet Giants Index.
OUSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OUSM and OGIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer