PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OGIG vs. XNTK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OGIG vs. XNTK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in O’Shares Global Internet Giants ETF (OGIG) and SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OGIG achieves a -5.95% return, which is significantly lower than XNTK's 39.42% return.


OGIG

1D
-1.78%
1M
11.60%
YTD
-5.95%
6M
-7.38%
1Y
-3.02%
3Y*
16.49%
5Y*
-1.08%
10Y*

XNTK

1D
2.68%
1M
22.48%
YTD
39.42%
6M
38.46%
1Y
78.56%
3Y*
43.30%
5Y*
21.80%
10Y*
25.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OGIG vs. XNTK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
OGIG
O’Shares Global Internet Giants ETF
-5.95%14.39%25.97%50.25%-50.64%-9.30%107.92%36.90%-24.48%
XNTK
SPDR NYSE Technology ETF
39.42%38.06%23.49%70.13%-41.07%17.63%73.91%38.08%-19.25%

Correlation

The correlation between OGIG and XNTK is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2018

0.87

The correlation between OGIG and XNTK shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

OGIG vs. XNTK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
OGIG
XNTK

Technology

54.4%
80.9%

Communication Services

26.4%
9.8%

Consumer Cyclical

16.5%
9.3%

Industrials

1.1%

-

Healthcare

0.8%

-

Real Estate

0.7%

-

Financial Services

0.2%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

OGIG
54.4%
XNTK
80.9%

Communication Services

OGIG
26.4%
XNTK
9.8%

Consumer Cyclical

OGIG
16.5%
XNTK
9.3%

Industrials

OGIG
1.1%
XNTK

-

Healthcare

OGIG
0.8%
XNTK

-

Real Estate

OGIG
0.7%
XNTK

-

Financial Services

OGIG
0.2%
XNTK

-

Basic Materials

OGIG

-

XNTK

-

Consumer Defensive

OGIG

-

XNTK

-

Energy

OGIG

-

XNTK

-

Utilities

OGIG

-

XNTK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OGIG vs. XNTK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OGIG
OGIG Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
OGIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OGIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
OGIG Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
OGIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
OGIG Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

XNTK
XNTK Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
XNTK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNTK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNTK Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
XNTK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNTK Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OGIG vs. XNTK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for O’Shares Global Internet Giants ETF (OGIG) and SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OGIGXNTKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.14

3.39

-3.53

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.04

3.98

-4.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.54

-0.54

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.07

4.69

-4.76

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.14

15.66

-15.80

OGIG vs. XNTK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OGIG Sharpe Ratio is -0.14, which is lower than the XNTK Sharpe Ratio of 3.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OGIG and XNTK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OGIGXNTKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

3.39

-3.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

0.79

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.45

-0.16

Drawdowns

OGIG vs. XNTK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OGIG drawdown since its inception was -66.05%, smaller than the maximum XNTK drawdown of -72.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OGIG and XNTK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OGIGXNTKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.05%

-72.38%

+6.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.23%

-17.00%

-16.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.23%

-28.11%

-5.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-62.79%

-48.28%

-14.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.30%

0.00%

-22.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.67%

-21.30%

-4.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.80%

5.09%

+10.71%

Volatility

OGIG vs. XNTK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for O’Shares Global Internet Giants ETF (OGIG) is 7.09%, while SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) has a volatility of 7.52%. This indicates that OGIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XNTK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OGIGXNTKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.09%

7.52%

-0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.95%

18.05%

-0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.90%

23.29%

-1.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.56%

27.91%

+3.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.01%

26.64%

+4.37%

OGIG vs. XNTK - Expense Ratio Comparison

OGIG has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than XNTK's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

OGIG vs. XNTK - Dividend Comparison

OGIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than XNTK's 0.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OGIG
O’Shares Global Internet Giants ETF
0.08%0.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XNTK
SPDR NYSE Technology ETF
0.16%0.23%0.42%0.34%0.85%0.34%0.30%0.61%29.64%1.29%0.81%0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


OGIG and XNTK have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XNTK has higher volatility (7.52%) compared to OGIG (7.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OGIG dropped -66.05% vs XNTK's -72.38%.

On 5-year performance, XNTK leads with 21.80% vs -1.08% for OGIG. On fees, XNTK is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, OGIG has been the lower-risk option at 7.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XNTK has performed better with a 21.80% return vs -1.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XNTK is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for OGIG.

XNTK has the higher dividend yield at 0.16%, compared with 0.08% for OGIG.

OGIG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while XNTK is Technology Equities. OGIG tracks O’Shares Global Internet Giants Index, while XNTK tracks NYSE Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: O'Shares Investments and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for OGIG and 0.35% for XNTK.

XNTK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.39 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OGIG and XNTK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer