PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OUSM vs. DGRS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OUSM vs. DGRS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) and WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OUSM achieves a 13.55% return, which is significantly lower than DGRS's 23.92% return.


OUSM

1D
1.07%
1M
3.02%
6M
8.44%
YTD
13.55%
1Y
17.33%
3Y*
12.20%
5Y*
8.65%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.48%

DGRS

1D
1.85%
1M
3.78%
6M
13.41%
YTD
23.92%
1Y
34.23%
3Y*
13.89%
5Y*
9.03%
10Y*
9.82%
ALL TIME*
9.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.65M$2.40M$1.87M
$4.86M$3.68M$3.03M

OUSM vs. DGRS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OUSM
OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF
13.55%2.17%13.45%18.82%-7.89%21.45%7.64%28.04%-10.60%10.85%
DGRS
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund
23.92%-0.43%10.40%21.16%-13.11%23.11%7.86%24.20%-10.75%7.25%

Correlation

The correlation between OUSM and DGRS is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2016

0.91

The correlation between OUSM and DGRS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

OUSM vs. DGRS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
OUSM
DGRS

Industrials

24.2%
19.5%

Financial Services

21.7%
25.5%

Consumer Cyclical

21.0%
16.3%

Technology

11.4%
9.1%

Healthcare

8.0%
1.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
6.5%

Utilities

4.1%
0.2%

Communication Services

3.5%
2.0%

Basic Materials

1.5%
8.0%

Energy

0.3%
10.0%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Industrials

OUSM
24.2%
DGRS
19.5%

Financial Services

OUSM
21.7%
DGRS
25.5%

Consumer Cyclical

OUSM
21.0%
DGRS
16.3%

Technology

OUSM
11.4%
DGRS
9.1%

Healthcare

OUSM
8.0%
DGRS
1.2%

Consumer Defensive

OUSM
4.3%
DGRS
6.5%

Utilities

OUSM
4.1%
DGRS
0.2%

Communication Services

OUSM
3.5%
DGRS
2.0%

Basic Materials

OUSM
1.5%
DGRS
8.0%

Energy

OUSM
0.3%
DGRS
10.0%

Real Estate

OUSM

-

DGRS
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OUSM vs. DGRS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

OUSM
OUSM Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
OUSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OUSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
OUSM Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
OUSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
OUSM Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRS
DGRS Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
DGRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRS Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRS Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

OUSM vs. DGRS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) and WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OUSMDGRSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.36

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

3.55

-1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.58

11.35

-5.77

OUSM vs. DGRS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OUSM Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is lower than the DGRS Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OUSM and DGRS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OUSM vs. DGRS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OUSM drawdown since its inception was -39.84%, smaller than the maximum DGRS drawdown of -44.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OUSM and DGRS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OUSMDGRSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.84%

-44.83%

+4.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.21%

-9.68%

+0.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.44%

-27.57%

+8.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.44%

-27.57%

+8.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.75%

0.00%

-0.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.14%

-6.65%

+1.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

3.02%

+0.09%

Volatility

OUSM vs. DGRS - Volatility Comparison

OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) and WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRS) have volatilities of 4.17% and 4.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OUSMDGRSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.17%

4.02%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.36%

10.67%

-1.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.13%

17.07%

-3.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.27%

20.24%

-3.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.85%

23.59%

-4.74%

OUSM vs. DGRS - Expense Ratio Comparison

OUSM has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRS's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

OUSM vs. DGRS - Dividend Comparison

OUSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, less than DGRS's 2.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRS
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund
2.00%2.68%2.15%2.36%2.88%2.19%2.32%2.39%2.64%1.90%1.82%2.55%
OUSM
OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF
1.91%2.09%1.62%1.64%1.98%1.55%2.02%1.99%2.63%2.17%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


OUSM and DGRS have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OUSM has higher volatility (4.17%) compared to DGRS (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OUSM dropped -39.84% vs DGRS's -44.83%.

On 5-year performance, DGRS leads with 9.03% vs 8.65% for OUSM. On fees, DGRS is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, DGRS has been the lower-risk option at 4.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DGRS has performed better with a 9.03% return vs 8.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRS is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for OUSM.

DGRS has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 1.91% for OUSM.

OUSM tracks O'Shares US Small-Cap Quality Dividend Index, while DGRS tracks WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: O'Shares Investments and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for OUSM and 0.38% for DGRS.

DGRS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OUSM and DGRS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer