DGRS vs. CALF
DGRS (WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund) and CALF (Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DGRS is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Index, while CALF is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DGRS returned 7.27%/yr vs 3.73%/yr for CALF. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DGRS charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for CALF.
Performance
DGRS vs. CALF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGRS achieves a 17.80% return, which is significantly higher than CALF's 10.59% return.
DGRS
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 3.82%
- YTD
- 17.80%
- 6M
- 15.58%
- 1Y
- 30.62%
- 3Y*
- 15.27%
- 5Y*
- 7.27%
- 10Y*
- 10.17%
CALF
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 10.59%
- 6M
- 8.95%
- 1Y
- 25.83%
- 3Y*
- 9.33%
- 5Y*
- 3.73%
- 10Y*
- —
DGRS vs. CALF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRS WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 17.80% | -0.43% | 10.40% | 21.16% | -13.11% | 23.11% | 7.86% | 24.20% | -10.75% | 8.35% |
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF | 10.59% | 2.33% | -7.41% | 35.43% | -15.20% | 40.68% | 16.55% | 18.18% | -10.06% | 5.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between DGRS and CALF is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2017 | 0.89 |
The correlation between DGRS and CALF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
DGRS vs. CALF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DGRS
CALF
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Technology
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Real Estate
Healthcare
Utilities
-
Financial Services
DGRS
CALF
Industrials
DGRS
CALF
Consumer Cyclical
DGRS
CALF
Energy
DGRS
CALF
Technology
DGRS
CALF
Basic Materials
DGRS
CALF
Consumer Defensive
DGRS
CALF
Communication Services
DGRS
CALF
Real Estate
DGRS
CALF
Healthcare
DGRS
CALF
Utilities
DGRS
CALF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGRS vs. CALF — Risk / Return Rank
DGRS
CALF
DGRS vs. CALF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRS) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DGRS | CALF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.29 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.18 | 4.22 | -1.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.80 | 11.59 | -1.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DGRS vs. CALF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGRS drawdown since its inception was -44.83%, smaller than the maximum CALF drawdown of -47.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRS and CALF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGRS | CALF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.83% | -47.58% | +2.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.68% | -6.15% | -3.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.57% | -34.22% | +6.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.57% | -34.22% | +6.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.67% | -4.33% | +3.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.70% | -10.69% | +3.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 2.23% | +0.90% |
Volatility
DGRS vs. CALF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRS) is 3.99%, while Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF) has a volatility of 5.39%. This indicates that DGRS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CALF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DGRS | CALF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.99% | 5.39% | -1.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.29% | 10.92% | +0.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.94% | 16.05% | +1.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.38% | 23.39% | -3.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.64% | 25.97% | -2.33% |
DGRS vs. CALF - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGRS has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than CALF's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
DGRS vs. CALF - Dividend Comparison
DGRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, more than CALF's 1.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF | 1.24% | 1.43% | 1.07% | 1.18% | 0.85% | 2.63% | 0.82% | 0.99% | 1.39% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DGRS WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 2.15% | 2.68% | 2.15% | 2.36% | 2.88% | 2.19% | 2.32% | 2.39% | 2.64% | 1.90% | 1.82% | 2.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DGRS and CALF have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CALF has higher volatility (5.39%) compared to DGRS (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRS dropped -44.83% vs CALF's -47.58%.
On 5-year performance, DGRS leads with 7.27% vs 3.73% for CALF. On fees, DGRS is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, DGRS has been the lower-risk option at 3.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DGRS has performed better with a 7.27% return vs 3.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DGRS is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for CALF.
DGRS has the higher dividend yield at 2.15%, compared with 1.24% for CALF.
DGRS is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while CALF is Small Cap Blend Equities. DGRS tracks WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Index, while CALF tracks Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for DGRS and 0.59% for CALF.
DGRS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DGRS and CALF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer