PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGRS vs. DGRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGRS vs. DGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRS) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGRS achieves a 17.80% return, which is significantly higher than DGRW's 7.35% return. Over the past 10 years, DGRS has underperformed DGRW with an annualized return of 10.17%, while DGRW has yielded a comparatively higher 14.25% annualized return.


DGRS

1D
0.12%
1M
3.82%
YTD
17.80%
6M
15.58%
1Y
30.62%
3Y*
15.27%
5Y*
7.27%
10Y*
10.17%

DGRW

1D
-0.32%
1M
-0.70%
YTD
7.35%
6M
7.02%
1Y
18.84%
3Y*
15.46%
5Y*
12.16%
10Y*
14.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGRS vs. DGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGRS
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund
17.80%-0.43%10.40%21.16%-13.11%23.11%7.86%24.20%-10.75%7.25%
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
7.35%12.17%16.98%18.66%-6.33%24.46%13.87%29.54%-5.38%26.90%

Correlation

The correlation between DGRS and DGRW is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2013

0.75

The correlation between DGRS and DGRW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

DGRS vs. DGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DGRS
DGRW

Financial Services

25.5%
11.3%

Industrials

19.1%
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

16.1%
7.1%

Energy

10.8%
5.0%

Technology

9.2%
32.1%

Basic Materials

8.1%
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

6.3%
6.7%

Communication Services

1.9%
10.1%

Real Estate

1.8%

-

Healthcare

1.2%
12.8%

Utilities

0.2%
0.2%

Financial Services

DGRS
25.5%
DGRW
11.3%

Industrials

DGRS
19.1%
DGRW
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

DGRS
16.1%
DGRW
7.1%

Energy

DGRS
10.8%
DGRW
5.0%

Technology

DGRS
9.2%
DGRW
32.1%

Basic Materials

DGRS
8.1%
DGRW
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

DGRS
6.3%
DGRW
6.7%

Communication Services

DGRS
1.9%
DGRW
10.1%

Real Estate

DGRS
1.8%
DGRW

-

Healthcare

DGRS
1.2%
DGRW
12.8%

Utilities

DGRS
0.2%
DGRW
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGRS vs. DGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGRS
DGRS Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
DGRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRS Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRS Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRW
DGRW Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
DGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGRS vs. DGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRS) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DGRSDGRWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.34

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.18

2.28

+0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.80

9.75

+0.06

DGRS vs. DGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGRS Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the DGRW Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGRS and DGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DGRS vs. DGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGRS drawdown since its inception was -44.83%, which is greater than DGRW's maximum drawdown of -32.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRS and DGRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGRSDGRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.83%

-32.04%

-12.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.68%

-8.30%

-1.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.57%

-16.21%

-11.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.57%

-17.27%

-10.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.83%

-32.04%

-12.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.67%

-2.42%

+1.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.70%

-3.01%

-3.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.13%

1.94%

+1.19%

Volatility

DGRS vs. DGRW - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRS) has a higher volatility of 3.99% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) at 3.64%. This indicates that DGRS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGRSDGRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.99%

3.64%

+0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.29%

8.21%

+3.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.94%

10.27%

+7.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.38%

14.01%

+6.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.64%

16.24%

+7.40%

DGRS vs. DGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGRS has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGRS vs. DGRW - Dividend Comparison

DGRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, more than DGRW's 1.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRS
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund
2.15%2.68%2.15%2.36%2.88%2.19%2.32%2.39%2.64%1.90%1.82%2.55%
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.29%1.43%1.55%1.74%2.15%1.78%1.93%2.20%2.42%1.71%2.13%2.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGRS and DGRW have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGRS has higher volatility (3.99%) compared to DGRW (3.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRS dropped -44.83% vs DGRW's -32.04%.

On 10-year performance, DGRW leads with 14.25% vs 10.17% for DGRS. On fees, DGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DGRW has been the lower-risk option at 3.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DGRW has performed better with a 14.25% return vs 10.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for DGRS.

DGRS has the higher dividend yield at 2.15%, compared with 1.29% for DGRW.

DGRS is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while DGRW is Dividend. DGRS tracks WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Index, while DGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for DGRS and 0.28% for DGRW.

DGRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGRS and DGRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer