PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OUSM vs. CSB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OUSM vs. CSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) and VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OUSM achieves a 6.80% return, which is significantly lower than CSB's 8.30% return.


OUSM

1D
-0.06%
1M
1.69%
YTD
6.80%
6M
6.94%
1Y
10.89%
3Y*
11.71%
5Y*
7.39%
10Y*

CSB

1D
-1.09%
1M
-1.58%
YTD
8.30%
6M
7.74%
1Y
17.95%
3Y*
11.48%
5Y*
3.65%
10Y*
9.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OUSM vs. CSB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OUSM
OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF
6.80%2.17%13.45%18.82%-7.89%21.45%7.64%28.04%-10.60%10.85%
CSB
VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
8.30%2.26%9.64%12.60%-13.11%27.04%11.30%21.12%-7.10%11.32%

Correlation

The correlation between OUSM and CSB is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.88

The correlation between OUSM and CSB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

OUSM vs. CSB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
OUSM
CSB

Industrials

22.8%
8.5%

Financial Services

21.1%
26.5%

Consumer Cyclical

19.3%
19.0%

Technology

13.5%
1.2%

Healthcare

9.2%
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.4%

Utilities

3.9%
22.0%

Communication Services

3.8%
3.6%

Basic Materials

1.4%
3.4%

Energy

0.3%
11.5%

Real Estate

-

-

Industrials

OUSM
22.8%
CSB
8.5%

Financial Services

OUSM
21.1%
CSB
26.5%

Consumer Cyclical

OUSM
19.3%
CSB
19.0%

Technology

OUSM
13.5%
CSB
1.2%

Healthcare

OUSM
9.2%
CSB
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

OUSM
4.9%
CSB
4.4%

Utilities

OUSM
3.9%
CSB
22.0%

Communication Services

OUSM
3.8%
CSB
3.6%

Basic Materials

OUSM
1.4%
CSB
3.4%

Energy

OUSM
0.3%
CSB
11.5%

Real Estate

OUSM

-

CSB

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OUSM vs. CSB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OUSM
OUSM Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
OUSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OUSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
OUSM Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
OUSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
OUSM Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

CSB
CSB Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
CSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSB Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
CSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSB Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OUSM vs. CSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) and VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OUSMCSBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.22

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.19

2.51

-1.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.47

7.26

-3.78

OUSM vs. CSB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OUSM Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the CSB Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OUSM and CSB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OUSMCSBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

1.25

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.20

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.45

+0.03

Drawdowns

OUSM vs. CSB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OUSM drawdown since its inception was -39.84%, smaller than the maximum CSB drawdown of -42.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OUSM and CSB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OUSMCSBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.84%

-42.07%

+2.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.21%

-7.18%

-2.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.44%

-21.82%

+2.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.44%

-24.49%

+5.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.67%

-3.12%

+1.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.22%

-7.14%

+1.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

2.48%

+0.66%

Volatility

OUSM vs. CSB - Volatility Comparison

OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) and VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) have volatilities of 3.66% and 3.59%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OUSMCSBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.66%

3.59%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.25%

9.19%

+0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.15%

14.54%

-1.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.30%

18.78%

-2.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.94%

21.31%

-2.37%

OUSM vs. CSB - Expense Ratio Comparison

OUSM has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than CSB's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

OUSM vs. CSB - Dividend Comparison

OUSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, less than CSB's 3.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSB
VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
3.26%3.54%3.12%3.45%3.60%3.11%3.70%3.19%3.45%3.19%2.85%1.57%
OUSM
OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF
2.07%2.09%1.62%1.64%1.98%1.55%2.02%1.99%2.63%2.17%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


OUSM and CSB have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OUSM has higher volatility (3.66%) compared to CSB (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OUSM dropped -39.84% vs CSB's -42.07%.

On 5-year performance, OUSM leads with 7.39% vs 3.65% for CSB. On fees, CSB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, OUSM has performed better with a 7.39% return vs 3.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CSB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for OUSM.

CSB has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 2.07% for OUSM.

OUSM tracks O'Shares US Small-Cap Quality Dividend Index, while CSB tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Small Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: O'Shares Investments and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for OUSM and 0.35% for CSB.

CSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OUSM and CSB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer