PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSB vs. VB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSB vs. VB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSB achieves a 9.49% return, which is significantly lower than VB's 14.91% return. Over the past 10 years, CSB has underperformed VB with an annualized return of 9.70%, while VB has yielded a comparatively higher 11.38% annualized return.


CSB

1D
0.91%
1M
-1.67%
YTD
9.49%
6M
10.26%
1Y
21.07%
3Y*
11.89%
5Y*
3.93%
10Y*
9.70%

VB

1D
0.75%
1M
3.68%
YTD
14.91%
6M
16.03%
1Y
31.39%
3Y*
17.31%
5Y*
7.35%
10Y*
11.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSB vs. VB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSB
VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
9.49%2.26%9.64%12.60%-13.11%27.04%11.30%21.12%-7.10%11.32%
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
14.91%8.87%14.17%18.22%-17.51%17.57%19.19%27.34%-9.34%16.26%

Correlation

The correlation between CSB and VB is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2015

0.82

The correlation between CSB and VB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

CSB vs. VB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CSB
VB

Financial Services

26.5%
12.6%

Utilities

22.0%
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

19.0%
11.3%

Energy

11.5%
4.7%

Industrials

8.5%
20.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
3.4%

Communication Services

3.6%
3.1%

Basic Materials

3.4%
4.8%

Technology

1.2%
17.2%

Healthcare

0.4%
11.1%

Real Estate

-

7.6%

Financial Services

CSB
26.5%
VB
12.6%

Utilities

CSB
22.0%
VB
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

CSB
19.0%
VB
11.3%

Energy

CSB
11.5%
VB
4.7%

Industrials

CSB
8.5%
VB
20.8%

Consumer Defensive

CSB
4.4%
VB
3.4%

Communication Services

CSB
3.6%
VB
3.1%

Basic Materials

CSB
3.4%
VB
4.8%

Technology

CSB
1.2%
VB
17.2%

Healthcare

CSB
0.4%
VB
11.1%

Real Estate

CSB

-

VB
7.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSB vs. VB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSB
CSB Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
CSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSB Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
CSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSB Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

VB
VB Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
VB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VB Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
VB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
VB Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSB vs. VB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSBVBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.46

1.94

-0.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.22

2.75

-0.53

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.34

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

3.48

-0.67

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.15

12.82

-4.68

CSB vs. VB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSB Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the VB Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSB and VB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSBVBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46

1.94

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

0.36

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.53

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.44

+0.01

Drawdowns

CSB vs. VB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSB drawdown since its inception was -42.07%, smaller than the maximum VB drawdown of -59.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSB and VB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSBVBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.07%

-59.56%

+17.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.18%

-8.98%

+1.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.82%

-25.36%

+3.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.49%

-28.15%

+3.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.07%

-42.05%

-0.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.05%

0.00%

-2.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.14%

-8.44%

+1.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.47%

2.43%

+0.04%

Volatility

CSB vs. VB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) is 3.62%, while Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) has a volatility of 4.40%. This indicates that CSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSBVBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.62%

4.40%

-0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.12%

11.73%

-2.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.52%

16.27%

-1.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.78%

20.75%

-1.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.31%

21.43%

-0.12%

CSB vs. VB - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VB's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSB vs. VB - Dividend Comparison

CSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, more than VB's 1.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSB
VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
3.23%3.54%3.12%3.45%3.60%3.11%3.70%3.19%3.45%3.19%2.85%1.57%
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
1.19%1.33%1.30%1.55%1.59%1.24%1.14%1.39%1.67%1.35%1.50%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSB and VB have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VB has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to CSB (3.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSB dropped -42.07% vs VB's -59.56%.

On 10-year performance, VB leads with 11.38% vs 9.70% for CSB. On fees, VB is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, CSB has been the lower-risk option at 3.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VB has performed better with a 11.38% return vs 9.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VB is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CSB.

CSB has the higher dividend yield at 3.23%, compared with 1.19% for VB.

CSB tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Small Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index, while VB tracks CRSP US Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Crestview and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CSB and 0.05% for VB.

VB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSB and VB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer