PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSB vs. VB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSB vs. VB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CSB having a 15.23% return and VB slightly lower at 15.19%. Over the past 10 years, CSB has underperformed VB with an annualized return of 10.15%, while VB has yielded a comparatively higher 11.08% annualized return.


CSB

1D
-0.53%
1M
1.25%
6M
8.88%
YTD
15.23%
1Y
24.42%
3Y*
11.11%
5Y*
6.13%
10Y*
10.15%
ALL TIME*
9.76%

VB

1D
-0.22%
1M
-1.73%
6M
10.09%
YTD
15.19%
1Y
25.91%
3Y*
14.02%
5Y*
7.45%
10Y*
11.08%
ALL TIME*
9.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$947.81K$1.11M$636.51K
$121.48M$119.40M$165.11M

CSB vs. VB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSB
VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
15.23%2.26%9.64%12.60%-13.11%27.04%11.30%21.12%-7.10%11.32%
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
15.19%8.87%14.17%18.22%-17.51%17.57%19.19%27.34%-9.34%16.26%

Correlation

The correlation between CSB and VB is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2015

0.81

The correlation between CSB and VB shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.85 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CSB vs. VB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CSB
VB

Financial Services

27.5%
12.4%

Utilities

21.3%
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

20.0%
11.6%

Energy

9.9%
3.9%

Industrials

8.5%
19.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
3.3%

Communication Services

3.8%
2.9%

Basic Materials

3.7%
4.4%

Technology

1.3%
17.9%

Healthcare

0.4%
12.5%

Real Estate

-

7.9%

Financial Services

CSB
27.5%
VB
12.4%

Utilities

CSB
21.3%
VB
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

CSB
20.0%
VB
11.6%

Energy

CSB
9.9%
VB
3.9%

Industrials

CSB
8.5%
VB
19.9%

Consumer Defensive

CSB
4.0%
VB
3.3%

Communication Services

CSB
3.8%
VB
2.9%

Basic Materials

CSB
3.7%
VB
4.4%

Technology

CSB
1.3%
VB
17.9%

Healthcare

CSB
0.4%
VB
12.5%

Real Estate

CSB

-

VB
7.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSB vs. VB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CSB
CSB Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
CSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSB Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
CSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSB Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

VB
VB Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
VB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VB Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
VB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
VB Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CSB vs. VB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSBVBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.26

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

2.67

+0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.49

9.73

-0.24

CSB vs. VB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSB Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the VB Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSB and VB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSB vs. VB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSB drawdown since its inception was -42.07%, smaller than the maximum VB drawdown of -59.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSB and VB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSBVBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.07%

-59.56%

+17.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.18%

-8.98%

+1.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.82%

-25.36%

+3.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.49%

-28.15%

+3.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.07%

-42.05%

-0.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.96%

-2.63%

+0.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.05%

-8.39%

+1.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.39%

2.46%

-0.07%

Volatility

CSB vs. VB - Volatility Comparison

VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) has a higher volatility of 3.59% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) at 3.36%. This indicates that CSB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSBVBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.59%

3.36%

+0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.87%

12.01%

-3.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.91%

16.47%

-2.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.59%

20.69%

-2.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.25%

21.37%

-0.12%

CSB vs. VB - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VB's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSB vs. VB - Dividend Comparison

CSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, more than VB's 1.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSB
VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
3.12%3.54%3.12%3.45%3.60%3.11%3.70%3.19%3.45%3.19%2.85%1.57%
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
1.22%1.33%1.30%1.55%1.59%1.24%1.14%1.39%1.67%1.35%1.50%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSB and VB have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CSB has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to VB (3.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSB dropped -42.07% vs VB's -59.56%.

On 10-year performance, VB leads with 11.08% vs 10.15% for CSB. On fees, VB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VB has been the lower-risk option at 3.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VB has performed better with a 11.08% return vs 10.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CSB.

CSB has the higher dividend yield at 3.12%, compared with 1.22% for VB.

CSB tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Small Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index, while VB tracks CRSP US Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Crestview and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CSB and 0.03% for VB.

CSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSB and VB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer