PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSB vs. XSVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSB vs. XSVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSB achieves a 11.28% return, which is significantly lower than XSVM's 20.98% return. Over the past 10 years, CSB has underperformed XSVM with an annualized return of 10.15%, while XSVM has yielded a comparatively higher 13.32% annualized return.


CSB

1D
1.01%
1M
0.76%
YTD
11.28%
6M
10.03%
1Y
20.88%
3Y*
12.91%
5Y*
4.69%
10Y*
10.15%

XSVM

1D
0.77%
1M
3.66%
YTD
20.98%
6M
18.82%
1Y
37.12%
3Y*
17.66%
5Y*
7.87%
10Y*
13.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSB vs. XSVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSB
VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
11.28%2.26%9.64%12.60%-13.11%27.04%11.30%21.12%-7.10%11.32%
XSVM
Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF
20.98%7.47%2.30%20.20%-13.63%56.36%5.08%30.01%-12.33%3.62%

Correlation

The correlation between CSB and XSVM is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2015

0.85

The correlation between CSB and XSVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

CSB vs. XSVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CSB
XSVM

Financial Services

26.9%
38.7%

Utilities

21.7%
1.2%

Consumer Cyclical

19.5%
17.4%

Energy

10.6%
9.3%

Industrials

8.5%
6.3%

Communication Services

4.0%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
6.9%

Basic Materials

3.6%
2.0%

Technology

1.3%
9.5%

Healthcare

0.4%
1.1%

Real Estate

-

4.8%

Financial Services

CSB
26.9%
XSVM
38.7%

Utilities

CSB
21.7%
XSVM
1.2%

Consumer Cyclical

CSB
19.5%
XSVM
17.4%

Energy

CSB
10.6%
XSVM
9.3%

Industrials

CSB
8.5%
XSVM
6.3%

Communication Services

CSB
4.0%
XSVM
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

CSB
4.0%
XSVM
6.9%

Basic Materials

CSB
3.6%
XSVM
2.0%

Technology

CSB
1.3%
XSVM
9.5%

Healthcare

CSB
0.4%
XSVM
1.1%

Real Estate

CSB

-

XSVM
4.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSB vs. XSVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSB
CSB Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
CSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSB Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
CSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSB Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

XSVM
XSVM Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
XSVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSVM Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
XSVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSVM Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSB vs. XSVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSBXSVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.36

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

3.70

-0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.44

11.45

-3.01

CSB vs. XSVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSB Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is comparable to the XSVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSB and XSVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSB vs. XSVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSB drawdown since its inception was -42.07%, smaller than the maximum XSVM drawdown of -62.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSB and XSVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSBXSVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.07%

-62.57%

+20.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.18%

-10.08%

+2.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.82%

-26.21%

+4.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.49%

-26.21%

+1.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.07%

-49.02%

+6.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.75%

-0.73%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.11%

-11.54%

+4.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.48%

3.25%

-0.77%

Volatility

CSB vs. XSVM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) is 3.79%, while Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) has a volatility of 4.63%. This indicates that CSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSBXSVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.79%

4.63%

-0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.28%

12.28%

-3.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.48%

18.54%

-4.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.71%

22.55%

-3.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.31%

25.07%

-3.76%

CSB vs. XSVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than XSVM's 0.37% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSB vs. XSVM - Dividend Comparison

CSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, more than XSVM's 1.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSB
VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
3.22%3.54%3.12%3.45%3.60%3.11%3.70%3.19%3.45%3.19%2.85%1.57%
XSVM
Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF
1.82%2.29%1.69%1.31%1.79%1.23%1.21%1.22%2.54%1.90%2.29%2.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSB and XSVM have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XSVM has higher volatility (4.63%) compared to CSB (3.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSB dropped -42.07% vs XSVM's -62.57%.

On 10-year performance, XSVM leads with 13.32% vs 10.15% for CSB. On fees, CSB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CSB has been the lower-risk option at 3.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XSVM has performed better with a 13.32% return vs 10.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CSB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for XSVM.

CSB has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 1.82% for XSVM.

CSB is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while XSVM is Momentum. CSB tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Small Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index, while XSVM tracks S&P SmallCap 600 High Momentum Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Crestview and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CSB and 0.37% for XSVM.

XSVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSB and XSVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer