PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OUSA vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OUSA vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OUSA achieves a 1.05% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, OUSA has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 10.22%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.56% annualized return.


OUSA

1D
-0.75%
1M
1.02%
YTD
1.05%
6M
1.29%
1Y
9.81%
3Y*
12.63%
5Y*
8.62%
10Y*
10.22%

VOO

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.04%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.93%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
15.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OUSA vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OUSA
OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF
1.05%10.23%17.09%13.44%-9.33%23.75%6.96%25.03%-3.11%18.81%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between OUSA and VOO is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2015

0.87

Over the past year, the correlation between OUSA and VOO has dropped to 0.64 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

OUSA vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
OUSA
VOO

Technology

23.4%
35.7%

Financial Services

18.5%
11.6%

Healthcare

14.1%
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

13.4%
10.2%

Industrials

11.6%
8.3%

Communication Services

11.4%
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

7.6%
4.9%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Energy

-

3.5%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Utilities

-

2.4%

Technology

OUSA
23.4%
VOO
35.7%

Financial Services

OUSA
18.5%
VOO
11.6%

Healthcare

OUSA
14.1%
VOO
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

OUSA
13.4%
VOO
10.2%

Industrials

OUSA
11.6%
VOO
8.3%

Communication Services

OUSA
11.4%
VOO
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

OUSA
7.6%
VOO
4.9%

Basic Materials

OUSA

-

VOO
1.8%

Energy

OUSA

-

VOO
3.5%

Real Estate

OUSA

-

VOO
1.9%

Utilities

OUSA

-

VOO
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OUSA vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OUSA
OUSA Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
OUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
OUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
OUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
OUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OUSA vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OUSAVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.43

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.18

3.16

-1.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.19

14.73

-10.54

OUSA vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OUSA Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OUSA and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OUSAVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.01

2.39

-1.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.83

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.87

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.89

-0.21

Drawdowns

OUSA vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OUSA drawdown since its inception was -33.12%, roughly equal to the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OUSA and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OUSAVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.12%

-33.99%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.36%

-8.90%

+0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.14%

-18.69%

+5.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.54%

-24.52%

+4.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.12%

-33.99%

+0.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.58%

-0.70%

-1.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.53%

-3.69%

+0.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.35%

1.91%

+0.44%

Volatility

OUSA vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) is 2.25%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 2.84%. This indicates that OUSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OUSAVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.25%

2.84%

-0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.18%

8.90%

-1.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.75%

11.80%

-2.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.30%

16.81%

-3.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.16%

18.01%

-2.85%

OUSA vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

OUSA has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

OUSA vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

OUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, more than VOO's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OUSA
OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF
1.42%1.39%1.50%1.81%1.92%1.56%2.03%2.31%3.06%2.15%2.32%1.17%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


OUSA and VOO have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOO has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to OUSA (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OUSA dropped -33.12% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.56% vs 10.22% for OUSA. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, OUSA has been the lower-risk option at 2.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.56% return vs 10.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for OUSA.

OUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 1.03% for VOO.

OUSA is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. OUSA tracks O'Shares US Quality Dividend Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: O'Shares Investments and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for OUSA and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OUSA and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer