PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OUSA vs. OUSM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OUSA vs. OUSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) and OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OUSA achieves a 1.05% return, which is significantly lower than OUSM's 6.80% return.


OUSA

1D
-0.75%
1M
1.02%
YTD
1.05%
6M
1.29%
1Y
9.81%
3Y*
12.63%
5Y*
8.62%
10Y*
10.22%

OUSM

1D
-0.06%
1M
1.69%
YTD
6.80%
6M
6.94%
1Y
10.89%
3Y*
11.71%
5Y*
7.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OUSA vs. OUSM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OUSA
OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF
1.05%10.23%17.09%13.44%-9.33%23.75%6.96%25.03%-3.11%18.81%
OUSM
OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF
6.80%2.17%13.45%18.82%-7.89%21.45%7.64%28.04%-10.60%10.85%

Correlation

The correlation between OUSA and OUSM is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.78

The correlation between OUSA and OUSM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

OUSA vs. OUSM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
OUSA
OUSM

Technology

23.4%
13.5%

Financial Services

18.5%
21.1%

Healthcare

14.1%
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

13.4%
19.3%

Industrials

11.6%
22.8%

Communication Services

11.4%
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

7.6%
4.9%

Basic Materials

-

1.4%

Energy

-

0.3%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

3.9%

Technology

OUSA
23.4%
OUSM
13.5%

Financial Services

OUSA
18.5%
OUSM
21.1%

Healthcare

OUSA
14.1%
OUSM
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

OUSA
13.4%
OUSM
19.3%

Industrials

OUSA
11.6%
OUSM
22.8%

Communication Services

OUSA
11.4%
OUSM
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

OUSA
7.6%
OUSM
4.9%

Basic Materials

OUSA

-

OUSM
1.4%

Energy

OUSA

-

OUSM
0.3%

Real Estate

OUSA

-

OUSM

-

Utilities

OUSA

-

OUSM
3.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OUSA vs. OUSM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OUSA
OUSA Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
OUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
OUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
OUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
OUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

OUSM
OUSM Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
OUSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OUSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
OUSM Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
OUSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
OUSM Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OUSA vs. OUSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) and OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OUSAOUSMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.15

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.18

1.19

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.19

3.47

+0.72

OUSA vs. OUSM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OUSA Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is comparable to the OUSM Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OUSA and OUSM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OUSAOUSMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.01

0.83

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.46

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.48

+0.21

Drawdowns

OUSA vs. OUSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OUSA drawdown since its inception was -33.12%, smaller than the maximum OUSM drawdown of -39.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OUSA and OUSM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OUSAOUSMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.12%

-39.84%

+6.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.36%

-9.21%

+0.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.14%

-19.44%

+6.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.54%

-19.44%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.58%

-1.67%

-0.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.53%

-5.22%

+1.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.35%

3.14%

-0.79%

Volatility

OUSA vs. OUSM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) is 2.25%, while OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) has a volatility of 3.66%. This indicates that OUSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OUSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OUSAOUSMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.25%

3.66%

-1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.18%

9.25%

-2.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.75%

13.15%

-3.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.30%

16.30%

-3.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.16%

18.94%

-3.78%

OUSA vs. OUSM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both OUSA and OUSM have an expense ratio of 0.48%.


Dividends

OUSA vs. OUSM - Dividend Comparison

OUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than OUSM's 2.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OUSA
OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF
1.42%1.39%1.50%1.81%1.92%1.56%2.03%2.31%3.06%2.15%2.32%1.17%
OUSM
OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF
2.07%2.09%1.62%1.64%1.98%1.55%2.02%1.99%2.63%2.17%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


OUSA and OUSM have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OUSM has higher volatility (3.66%) compared to OUSA (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OUSA dropped -33.12% vs OUSM's -39.84%.

On 5-year performance, OUSA leads with 8.62% vs 7.39% for OUSM. Both ETFs have the same 0.48% expense ratio. On volatility, OUSA has been the lower-risk option at 2.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, OUSA has performed better with a 8.62% return vs 7.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OUSA and OUSM have the same expense ratio: 0.48% per year.

OUSM has the higher dividend yield at 2.07%, compared with 1.42% for OUSA.

OUSA is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while OUSM is Small Cap Blend Equities. OUSA tracks O'Shares US Quality Dividend Index, while OUSM tracks O'Shares US Small-Cap Quality Dividend Index.

OUSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OUSA and OUSM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer