OSW vs. CLS

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

OSW (OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited) and CLS (Celestica Inc.) are both stocks. OSW operates in Leisure (Consumer Cyclical), while CLS operates in Electronic Components (Technology). Over the past 5 years, OSW returned 15.46%/yr vs 123.77%/yr for CLS. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

OSW vs. CLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited (OSW) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OSW achieves a 15.47% return, which is significantly lower than CLS's 59.81% return.

OSW

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: -5.23%
• YTD: 15.47%
• 6M: 19.03%
• 1Y: 26.92%
• 3Y*: 29.80%
• 5Y*: 15.46%
• 10Y*: —

CLS

• 1D: 10.75%
• 1M: 12.76%
• YTD: 59.81%
• 6M: 55.25%
• 1Y: 305.01%
• 3Y*: 230.21%
• 5Y*: 123.77%
• 10Y*: 45.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OSW vs. CLS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
OSW OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited	15.47%	5.14%	41.81%	51.13%	-6.89%	-1.18%	-38.85%	42.11%
CLS Celestica Inc.	59.81%	220.27%	215.23%	159.80%	1.26%	37.92%	-2.42%	-4.06%

Correlation

The correlation between OSW and CLS is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.26
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2019	0.31

Over the past year, the correlation between OSW and CLS has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.31, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap OSW : $2.44B CLS : $54.66B
EPS OSW : $0.75 CLS : $8.28
PE Ratio OSW : 31.70 CLS : 57.02
PEG Ratio OSW : 0.60 CLS : 0.76
PS Ratio OSW : 2.49 CLS : 3.96
PB Ratio OSW : 4.34 CLS : 26.05
Total Revenue (TTM) OSW : $989.00M CLS : $13.81B
Gross Profit (TTM) OSW : $135.02M CLS : $1.60B
EBITDA (TTM) OSW : $113.22M CLS : $1.32B

Return for Risk

OSW vs. CLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OSW

OSW Risk / Return Rank: 65
OSW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
OSW Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
OSW Omega Ratio Rank: 58
OSW Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
OSW Martin Ratio Rank: 69

CLS

CLS Risk / Return Rank: 95
CLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
CLS Omega Ratio Rank: 92
CLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CLS Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OSW vs. CLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited (OSW) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	OSW	CLS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.84	4.35	-3.51
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.37	3.57	-2.20
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.48	-0.32
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.65	10.58	-8.94
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.65	26.76	-23.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

OSW vs. CLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OSW Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the CLS Sharpe Ratio of 4.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OSW and CLS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	OSW	CLS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84	4.35	-3.51
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40	2.18	-1.78
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.93	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.19	0.29	-0.09

Drawdowns

OSW vs. CLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OSW drawdown since its inception was -85.03%, smaller than the maximum CLS drawdown of -96.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OSW and CLS.

Drawdown Indicators

	OSW	CLS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.03%	-96.93%	+11.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.73%	-29.24%	+12.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.57%	-53.96%	+19.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.03%	-53.96%	+8.93%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-80.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.64%	0.00%	-5.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.21%	-73.39%	+46.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.53%	11.56%	-4.03%

Volatility

OSW vs. CLS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited (OSW) is 11.95%, while Celestica Inc. (CLS) has a volatility of 21.94%. This indicates that OSW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OSW	CLS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.95%	21.94%	-9.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.92%	53.58%	-28.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.28%	70.67%	-38.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.93%	57.19%	-18.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	55.61%	49.69%	+5.92%

Dividends

OSW vs. CLS - Dividend Comparison

OSW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, while CLS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CLS Celestica Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
OSW OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited	0.80%	0.82%	0.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.79%

Financials

OSW vs. CLS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited and Celestica Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

OSW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 37.43M and revenue of 247.63M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.1%.

CLS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 437.20M and revenue of 4.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.8%.

OSW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited reported an operating income of 22.87M and revenue of 247.63M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.2%.

CLS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 272.10M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.

OSW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited reported a net income of 21.33M and revenue of 247.63M, resulting in a net margin of 8.6%.

CLS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 212.30M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OSW and CLS in my portfolio?

OSW and CLS have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OSW or CLS?

CLS has higher volatility (21.94%) compared to OSW (11.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OSW dropped -85.03% vs CLS's -96.93%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.35 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.