PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OSW vs. GMIN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

OSW vs. GMIN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited (OSW) and G Mining Ventures Corp (GMIN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

OSW is traded in USD, while GMIN.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the GMIN.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OSW achieves a 15.47% return, which is significantly higher than GMIN.TO's -2.87% return.


OSW

1D
0.17%
1M
-5.23%
YTD
15.47%
6M
19.03%
1Y
26.92%
3Y*
29.80%
5Y*
15.46%
10Y*

GMIN.TO

1D
0.98%
1M
-15.74%
YTD
-2.87%
6M
22.84%
1Y
86.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OSW vs. GMIN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
OSW
OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited
15.47%5.14%53.57%
GMIN.TO
G Mining Ventures Corp
-2.87%302.58%14.38%

Correlation

The correlation between OSW and GMIN.TO is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2024

-0.01

Fundamentals

Market Cap

OSW:

$2.44B

GMIN.TO:

CA$9.49B

EPS

OSW:

$0.75

GMIN.TO:

CA$1.49

PE Ratio

OSW:

31.70

GMIN.TO:

27.31

PEG Ratio

OSW:

0.60

GMIN.TO:

0.11

PS Ratio

OSW:

2.49

GMIN.TO:

15.07

PB Ratio

OSW:

4.34

GMIN.TO:

5.22

Total Revenue (TTM)

OSW:

$989.00M

GMIN.TO:

CA$623.23M

Gross Profit (TTM)

OSW:

$135.02M

GMIN.TO:

CA$430.96M

EBITDA (TTM)

OSW:

$113.22M

GMIN.TO:

CA$514.55M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OSW vs. GMIN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OSW
OSW Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
OSW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OSW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
OSW Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
OSW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
OSW Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

GMIN.TO
GMIN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
GMIN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMIN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMIN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
GMIN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMIN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OSW vs. GMIN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited (OSW) and G Mining Ventures Corp (GMIN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OSWGMIN.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.84

1.30

-0.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.37

1.87

-0.49

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.24

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

2.49

-0.85

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.65

5.74

-2.08

OSW vs. GMIN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OSW Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the GMIN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OSW and GMIN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OSWGMIN.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

1.30

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

1.69

-1.49

Drawdowns

OSW vs. GMIN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OSW drawdown since its inception was -85.03%, which is greater than GMIN.TO's maximum drawdown of -34.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OSW and GMIN.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OSWGMIN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.03%

-34.88%

-50.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.73%

-34.88%

+18.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.64%

-31.35%

+25.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.21%

-10.10%

-17.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.53%

15.11%

-7.58%

Volatility

OSW vs. GMIN.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited (OSW) is 11.95%, while G Mining Ventures Corp (GMIN.TO) has a volatility of 22.27%. This indicates that OSW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GMIN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OSWGMIN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.95%

22.27%

-10.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.92%

53.13%

-28.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.28%

67.36%

-35.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.93%

59.86%

-20.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

55.61%

59.86%

-4.25%

Dividends

OSW vs. GMIN.TO - Dividend Comparison

OSW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, while GMIN.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
GMIN.TO
G Mining Ventures Corp
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OSW
OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited
0.80%0.82%0.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.79%

Financials

OSW vs. GMIN.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited and G Mining Ventures Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M20222023202420252026
247.63M
137.64M
(OSW) Total Revenue
(GMIN.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. OSW values in USD, GMIN.TO values in CAD

OSW vs. GMIN.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited and G Mining Ventures Corp over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-60.0%-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
15.1%
64.6%
Portfolio components
OSW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 37.43M and revenue of 247.63M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.1%.

GMIN.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, G Mining Ventures Corp reported a gross profit of 88.88M and revenue of 137.64M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.6%.

OSW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited reported an operating income of 22.87M and revenue of 247.63M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.2%.

GMIN.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, G Mining Ventures Corp reported an operating income of 83.72M and revenue of 137.64M, resulting in an operating margin of 60.8%.

OSW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited reported a net income of 21.33M and revenue of 247.63M, resulting in a net margin of 8.6%.

GMIN.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, G Mining Ventures Corp reported a net income of 79.05M and revenue of 137.64M, resulting in a net margin of 57.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


OSW and GMIN.TO have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OSW and GMIN.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer