OSUR vs. BXC
OSUR (OraSure Technologies, Inc.) and BXC (BlueLinx Holdings Inc.) are both stocks. OSUR operates in Medical Instruments & Supplies (Healthcare), while BXC operates in Building Products & Equipment (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, OSUR returned -4.87%/yr vs 22.34%/yr for BXC. Their 0.20 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
OSUR vs. BXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OSUR achieves a 67.36% return, which is significantly higher than BXC's -11.74% return. Over the past 10 years, OSUR has underperformed BXC with an annualized return of -4.87%, while BXC has yielded a comparatively higher 22.34% annualized return.
OSUR
- 1D
- 2.02%
- 1M
- -6.90%
- 6M
- 45.16%
- YTD
- 67.36%
- 1Y
- 34.55%
- 3Y*
- -4.43%
- 5Y*
- -19.24%
- 10Y*
- -4.87%
- ALL TIME*
- -3.82%
BXC
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- -4.61%
- 6M
- -22.05%
- YTD
- -11.74%
- 1Y
- -24.68%
- 3Y*
- -17.47%
- 5Y*
- 4.77%
- 10Y*
- 22.34%
- ALL TIME*
- -2.74%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.64M | $8.28M | $8.32M | |
| $1.37M | $1.49M | $2.50M |
OSUR vs. BXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OSUR OraSure Technologies, Inc. | 67.36% | -32.96% | -55.98% | 70.12% | -44.53% | -17.90% | 31.82% | -31.25% | -38.07% | 114.81% |
BXC BlueLinx Holdings Inc. | -11.74% | -39.87% | -9.84% | 59.34% | -25.74% | 227.27% | 105.33% | -42.33% | 153.18% | 30.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between OSUR and BXC is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2004 | 0.20 |
The correlation between OSUR and BXC shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (all time) to 0.33 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
OSUR:
$278.84M
BXC:
$421.96M
OSUR:
-$0.74
BXC:
-$0.76
OSUR:
3.40
BXC:
0.10
OSUR:
$85.12M
BXC:
$2.98B
OSUR:
$33.04M
BXC:
$447.15M
OSUR:
-$47.07M
BXC:
$79.53M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OSUR vs. BXC — Risk / Return Rank
OSUR
BXC
OSUR vs. BXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OraSure Technologies, Inc. (OSUR) and BlueLinx Holdings Inc. (BXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OSUR | BXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 0.96 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.70 | -0.55 | +1.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.59 | -0.92 | +2.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OSUR vs. BXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OSUR drawdown since its inception was -90.75%, smaller than the maximum BXC drawdown of -97.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OSUR and BXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OSUR | BXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.75% | -97.46% | +6.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.37% | -47.38% | +8.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.73% | -65.56% | -9.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.23% | -65.56% | -18.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -90.75% | -91.71% | +0.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -82.24% | -58.88% | -23.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.80% | -65.91% | +9.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.33% | 28.34% | -11.01% |
Volatility
OSUR vs. BXC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for OraSure Technologies, Inc. (OSUR) is 10.72%, while BlueLinx Holdings Inc. (BXC) has a volatility of 19.97%. This indicates that OSUR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OSUR | BXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.72% | 19.97% | -9.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.71% | 50.04% | -16.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.38% | 60.61% | -12.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.65% | 56.34% | -1.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.66% | 70.61% | -13.95% |
Dividends
OSUR vs. BXC - Dividend Comparison
Neither OSUR nor BXC has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
OSUR vs. BXC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between OraSure Technologies, Inc. and BlueLinx Holdings Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
OSUR vs. BXC - Profitability Comparison
OSUR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, OraSure Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 11.80K and revenue of 27.93K. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.3%.
BXC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, BlueLinx Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 116.40M and revenue of 731.15M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.9%.
OSUR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, OraSure Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of -23.18K and revenue of 27.93K, resulting in an operating margin of -83.0%.
BXC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, BlueLinx Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 7.33M and revenue of 731.15M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.0%.
OSUR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, OraSure Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of -22.38K and revenue of 27.93K, resulting in a net margin of -80.1%.
BXC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, BlueLinx Holdings Inc. reported a net income of -1.46M and revenue of 731.15M, resulting in a net margin of -0.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
OSUR and BXC have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BXC has higher volatility (19.97%) compared to OSUR (10.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OSUR dropped -90.75% vs BXC's -97.46%.
OSUR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.57 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OSUR and BXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer