PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OSUR vs. MFC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

OSUR vs. MFC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OraSure Technologies, Inc. (OSUR) and Manulife Financial Corporation (MFC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OSUR achieves a 67.36% return, which is significantly higher than MFC's 24.86% return. Over the past 10 years, OSUR has underperformed MFC with an annualized return of -4.87%, while MFC has yielded a comparatively higher 18.03% annualized return.


OSUR

1D
2.02%
1M
-6.90%
6M
45.16%
YTD
67.36%
1Y
34.55%
3Y*
-4.43%
5Y*
-19.24%
10Y*
-4.87%
ALL TIME*
-3.82%

MFC

1D
-0.25%
1M
7.92%
6M
18.87%
YTD
24.86%
1Y
51.68%
3Y*
37.04%
5Y*
24.01%
10Y*
18.03%
ALL TIME*
11.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$74.72M$67.05M$82.57M
$1.37M$1.49M$2.50M

OSUR vs. MFC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OSUR
OraSure Technologies, Inc.
67.36%-32.96%-55.98%70.12%-44.53%-17.90%31.82%-31.25%-38.07%114.81%
MFC
Manulife Financial Corporation
24.86%22.95%45.75%31.13%-1.18%12.17%-7.18%49.19%-29.89%22.17%

Correlation

The correlation between OSUR and MFC is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 1999

0.24

Fundamentals

Market Cap

OSUR:

$278.84M

MFC:

$74.17B

EPS

OSUR:

-$0.74

MFC:

CA$4.17

PS Ratio

OSUR:

3.40

MFC:

1.21

Total Revenue (TTM)

OSUR:

$85.12M

MFC:

CA$79.35B

Gross Profit (TTM)

OSUR:

$33.04M

MFC:

CA$26.46B

EBITDA (TTM)

OSUR:

-$47.07M

MFC:

CA$8.26B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OSUR vs. MFC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

OSUR
OSUR Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
OSUR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OSUR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
OSUR Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
OSUR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
OSUR Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

MFC
MFC Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
MFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFC Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
MFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFC Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

OSUR vs. MFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OraSure Technologies, Inc. (OSUR) and Manulife Financial Corporation (MFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OSURMFCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.42

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.70

3.96

-3.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.59

12.30

-10.71

OSUR vs. MFC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OSUR Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is lower than the MFC Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OSUR and MFC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OSUR vs. MFC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OSUR drawdown since its inception was -90.75%, which is greater than MFC's maximum drawdown of -83.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OSUR and MFC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OSURMFCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.75%

-83.61%

-7.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.37%

-12.49%

-26.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-74.73%

-16.75%

-57.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-84.23%

-26.99%

-57.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-90.75%

-57.44%

-33.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-82.24%

-0.45%

-81.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-56.80%

-29.25%

-27.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.33%

4.01%

+13.32%

Volatility

OSUR vs. MFC - Volatility Comparison

OraSure Technologies, Inc. (OSUR) has a higher volatility of 10.72% compared to Manulife Financial Corporation (MFC) at 5.22%. This indicates that OSUR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OSURMFCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.72%

5.22%

+5.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.71%

15.97%

+17.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.38%

20.17%

+28.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.65%

24.05%

+30.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.66%

28.11%

+28.55%

Dividends

OSUR vs. MFC - Dividend Comparison

OSUR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MFC
Manulife Financial Corporation
3.01%3.45%4.16%4.86%5.71%4.91%4.70%3.71%4.08%3.93%4.15%5.38%
OSUR
OraSure Technologies, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

OSUR vs. MFC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between OraSure Technologies, Inc. and Manulife Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

OSUR vs. MFC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between OraSure Technologies, Inc. and Manulife Financial Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

OSUR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, OraSure Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 11.80K and revenue of 27.93K. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.3%.

MFC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Manulife Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 12.31B and revenue of 12.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

OSUR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, OraSure Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of -23.18K and revenue of 27.93K, resulting in an operating margin of -83.0%.

MFC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Manulife Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 1.47B and revenue of 12.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.9%.

OSUR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, OraSure Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of -22.38K and revenue of 27.93K, resulting in a net margin of -80.1%.

MFC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Manulife Financial Corporation reported a net income of 1.20B and revenue of 12.31B, resulting in a net margin of 9.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


OSUR and MFC have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OSUR has higher volatility (10.72%) compared to MFC (5.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OSUR dropped -90.75% vs MFC's -83.61%.

MFC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OSUR and MFC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer