OSUR vs. CCRN
OSUR (OraSure Technologies, Inc.) and CCRN (Cross Country Healthcare, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Healthcare sector — OSUR in Medical Instruments & Supplies, CCRN in Medical Care Facilities. Over the past 10 years, OSUR returned -4.87%/yr vs -1.76%/yr for CCRN. Their 0.30 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
OSUR vs. CCRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OSUR achieves a 67.36% return, which is significantly higher than CCRN's 63.58% return. Over the past 10 years, OSUR has underperformed CCRN with an annualized return of -4.87%, while CCRN has yielded a comparatively higher -1.76% annualized return.
OSUR
- 1D
- 2.02%
- 1M
- -6.90%
- 6M
- 45.16%
- YTD
- 67.36%
- 1Y
- 34.55%
- 3Y*
- -4.43%
- 5Y*
- -19.24%
- 10Y*
- -4.87%
- ALL TIME*
- -3.82%
CCRN
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- 6M
- 42.17%
- YTD
- 63.58%
- 1Y
- 1.61%
- 3Y*
- -21.56%
- 5Y*
- -3.14%
- 10Y*
- -1.76%
- ALL TIME*
- -1.70%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $10.14M | $8.12M | $9.92M | |
| $1.37M | $1.49M | $2.50M |
OSUR vs. CCRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OSUR OraSure Technologies, Inc. | 67.36% | -32.96% | -55.98% | 70.12% | -44.53% | -17.90% | 31.82% | -31.25% | -38.07% | 114.81% |
CCRN Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. | 63.58% | -55.40% | -19.79% | -14.79% | -4.29% | 212.97% | -23.67% | 58.53% | -42.55% | -18.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between OSUR and CCRN is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2001 | 0.30 |
The correlation between OSUR and CCRN shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (10 years) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
OSUR:
$278.84M
CCRN:
$428.06M
OSUR:
-$0.74
CCRN:
-$3.07
OSUR:
3.40
CCRN:
0.56
OSUR:
$85.12M
CCRN:
$760.89M
OSUR:
$33.04M
CCRN:
$138.12M
OSUR:
-$47.07M
CCRN:
$9.42M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OSUR vs. CCRN — Risk / Return Rank
OSUR
CCRN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
OSUR vs. CCRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OraSure Technologies, Inc. (OSUR) and Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. (CCRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OSUR | CCRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.06 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.70 | -0.02 | +0.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.59 | -0.04 | +1.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OSUR vs. CCRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OSUR drawdown since its inception was -90.75%, roughly equal to the maximum CCRN drawdown of -90.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OSUR and CCRN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OSUR | CCRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.75% | -90.04% | -0.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.37% | -47.08% | +7.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.73% | -70.77% | -3.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.23% | -80.24% | -3.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -90.75% | -80.24% | -10.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -82.24% | -65.90% | -16.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.80% | -64.47% | +7.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.33% | 25.17% | -7.84% |
Volatility
OSUR vs. CCRN - Volatility Comparison
OraSure Technologies, Inc. (OSUR) has a higher volatility of 10.72% compared to Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. (CCRN) at 0.42%. This indicates that OSUR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OSUR | CCRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.72% | 0.42% | +10.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.71% | 32.05% | +1.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.38% | 54.53% | -6.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.65% | 59.86% | -5.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.66% | 56.78% | -0.12% |
Dividends
OSUR vs. CCRN - Dividend Comparison
Neither OSUR nor CCRN has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
OSUR vs. CCRN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between OraSure Technologies, Inc. and Cross Country Healthcare, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
OSUR and CCRN have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OSUR has higher volatility (10.72%) compared to CCRN (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OSUR dropped -90.75% vs CCRN's -90.04%.
OSUR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.57 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OSUR and CCRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer