BXC vs. CARG
BXC (BlueLinx Holdings Inc.) and CARG (CarGurus, Inc.) are both stocks. BXC operates in Building Products & Equipment (Industrials), while CARG operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). Over the past 5 years, BXC returned 3.19%/yr vs 2.02%/yr for CARG. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BXC vs. CARG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BXC achieves a -10.87% return, which is significantly higher than CARG's -20.63% return.
BXC
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- 12.08%
- YTD
- -10.87%
- 6M
- -10.93%
- 1Y
- -25.59%
- 3Y*
- -15.16%
- 5Y*
- 3.19%
- 10Y*
- 22.49%
CARG
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- 7.79%
- YTD
- -20.63%
- 6M
- -22.01%
- 1Y
- -6.42%
- 3Y*
- 13.88%
- 5Y*
- 2.02%
- 10Y*
- —
BXC vs. CARG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BXC BlueLinx Holdings Inc. | -10.87% | -39.87% | -9.84% | 59.34% | -25.74% | 227.27% | 105.33% | -42.33% | 153.18% | -1.71% |
CARG CarGurus, Inc. | -20.63% | 4.95% | 51.24% | 72.45% | -58.35% | 6.02% | -9.81% | 4.30% | 12.51% | 3.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between BXC and CARG is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2017 | 0.35 |
The correlation between BXC and CARG shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (1 year) to 0.42 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BXC:
-$0.68
CARG:
$1.52
BXC:
0.11
CARG:
3.11
BXC:
$2.98B
CARG:
$957.38M
BXC:
$447.15M
CARG:
$860.45M
BXC:
$79.53M
CARG:
$251.92M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BXC vs. CARG — Risk / Return Rank
BXC
CARG
BXC vs. CARG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlueLinx Holdings Inc. (BXC) and CarGurus, Inc. (CARG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BXC | CARG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.00 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.54 | -0.21 | -0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.96 | -0.47 | -0.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BXC vs. CARG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BXC drawdown since its inception was -97.46%, which is greater than CARG's maximum drawdown of -78.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BXC and CARG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BXC | CARG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.46% | -78.66% | -18.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.62% | -30.92% | -16.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.56% | -37.88% | -27.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.56% | -75.38% | +9.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -91.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -58.48% | -45.56% | -12.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.95% | -44.06% | -21.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.72% | 13.66% | +13.06% |
Volatility
BXC vs. CARG - Volatility Comparison
BlueLinx Holdings Inc. (BXC) has a higher volatility of 13.83% compared to CarGurus, Inc. (CARG) at 12.74%. This indicates that BXC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CARG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BXC | CARG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.83% | 12.74% | +1.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.25% | 29.86% | +17.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.26% | 36.69% | +22.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.22% | 50.43% | +5.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 70.26% | 50.64% | +19.62% |
Dividends
BXC vs. CARG - Dividend Comparison
Neither BXC nor CARG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
BXC vs. CARG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BlueLinx Holdings Inc. and CarGurus, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BXC vs. CARG - Profitability Comparison
BXC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BlueLinx Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 116.40M and revenue of 731.15M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.9%.
CARG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CarGurus, Inc. reported a gross profit of 224.62M and revenue of 243.56M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 92.2%.
BXC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BlueLinx Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 7.33M and revenue of 731.15M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.0%.
CARG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CarGurus, Inc. reported an operating income of 40.08M and revenue of 243.56M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.5%.
BXC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BlueLinx Holdings Inc. reported a net income of -1.46M and revenue of 731.15M, resulting in a net margin of -0.2%.
CARG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CarGurus, Inc. reported a net income of 32.23M and revenue of 243.56M, resulting in a net margin of 13.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BXC and CARG have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BXC has higher volatility (13.83%) compared to CARG (12.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BXC dropped -97.46% vs CARG's -78.66%.
CARG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.18 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BXC and CARG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer