BXC vs. CCRN
BXC (BlueLinx Holdings Inc.) and CCRN (Cross Country Healthcare, Inc.) are both stocks. BXC operates in Building Products & Equipment (Industrials), while CCRN operates in Medical Care Facilities (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, BXC returned 22.66%/yr vs -0.27%/yr for CCRN. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BXC vs. CCRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BXC achieves a -9.62% return, which is significantly lower than CCRN's 62.59% return. Over the past 10 years, BXC has outperformed CCRN with an annualized return of 22.66%, while CCRN has yielded a comparatively lower -0.27% annualized return.
BXC
- 1D
- -3.54%
- 1M
- 13.65%
- YTD
- -9.62%
- 6M
- -8.79%
- 1Y
- -19.23%
- 3Y*
- -14.76%
- 5Y*
- 4.04%
- 10Y*
- 22.66%
CCRN
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.92%
- YTD
- 62.59%
- 6M
- 65.45%
- 1Y
- -6.13%
- 3Y*
- -20.79%
- 5Y*
- -5.69%
- 10Y*
- -0.27%
BXC vs. CCRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BXC BlueLinx Holdings Inc. | -9.62% | -39.87% | -9.84% | 59.34% | -25.74% | 227.27% | 105.33% | -42.33% | 153.18% | 30.66% |
CCRN Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. | 62.59% | -55.40% | -19.79% | -14.79% | -4.29% | 212.97% | -23.67% | 58.53% | -42.55% | -18.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between BXC and CCRN is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2004 | 0.21 |
The correlation between BXC and CCRN shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.25 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BXC:
-$0.68
CCRN:
-$3.06
BXC:
0.11
CCRN:
0.56
BXC:
$2.98B
CCRN:
$760.89M
BXC:
$447.15M
CCRN:
$138.12M
BXC:
$79.53M
CCRN:
$9.42M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BXC vs. CCRN — Risk / Return Rank
BXC
CCRN
BXC vs. CCRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlueLinx Holdings Inc. (BXC) and Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. (CCRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BXC | CCRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.03 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.41 | -0.13 | -0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.72 | -0.24 | -0.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BXC vs. CCRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BXC drawdown since its inception was -97.46%, which is greater than CCRN's maximum drawdown of -90.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BXC and CCRN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BXC | CCRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.46% | -90.04% | -7.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.62% | -47.08% | -0.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.56% | -73.43% | +7.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.56% | -80.24% | +14.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -91.71% | -80.24% | -11.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.89% | -66.11% | +8.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.96% | -64.46% | -1.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.62% | 25.26% | +1.36% |
Volatility
BXC vs. CCRN - Volatility Comparison
BlueLinx Holdings Inc. (BXC) has a higher volatility of 13.73% compared to Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. (CCRN) at 0.84%. This indicates that BXC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BXC | CCRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.73% | 0.84% | +12.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.30% | 33.60% | +13.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.36% | 55.58% | +3.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.22% | 60.02% | -3.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 70.27% | 56.88% | +13.39% |
Dividends
BXC vs. CCRN - Dividend Comparison
Neither BXC nor CCRN has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
BXC vs. CCRN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BlueLinx Holdings Inc. and Cross Country Healthcare, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
BXC and CCRN have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BXC has higher volatility (13.73%) compared to CCRN (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BXC dropped -97.46% vs CCRN's -90.04%.
CCRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.11 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BXC and CCRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer