BXC vs. WHD
BXC (BlueLinx Holdings Inc.) and WHD (Cactus, Inc.) are both stocks. BXC operates in Building Products & Equipment (Industrials), while WHD operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy). Over the past 5 years, BXC returned 3.19%/yr vs 7.64%/yr for WHD. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BXC vs. WHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BXC achieves a -10.87% return, which is significantly lower than WHD's 16.26% return.
BXC
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- 12.08%
- YTD
- -10.87%
- 6M
- -10.93%
- 1Y
- -25.59%
- 3Y*
- -15.16%
- 5Y*
- 3.19%
- 10Y*
- 22.49%
WHD
- 1D
- -2.55%
- 1M
- -14.92%
- YTD
- 16.26%
- 6M
- 14.21%
- 1Y
- 21.69%
- 3Y*
- 12.06%
- 5Y*
- 7.64%
- 10Y*
- —
BXC vs. WHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BXC BlueLinx Holdings Inc. | -10.87% | -39.87% | -9.84% | 59.34% | -25.74% | 227.27% | 105.33% | -42.33% | 50.21% |
WHD Cactus, Inc. | 16.26% | -20.76% | 29.72% | -8.69% | 33.00% | 47.83% | -22.85% | 25.57% | 29.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between BXC and WHD is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2018 | 0.32 |
Fundamentals
BXC:
-$0.68
WHD:
$1.06
BXC:
0.11
WHD:
3.08
BXC:
$2.98B
WHD:
$1.19B
BXC:
$447.15M
WHD:
$485.56M
BXC:
$79.53M
WHD:
$300.14M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BXC vs. WHD — Risk / Return Rank
BXC
WHD
BXC vs. WHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlueLinx Holdings Inc. (BXC) and Cactus, Inc. (WHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BXC | WHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.12 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.54 | 0.72 | -1.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.96 | 1.83 | -2.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BXC vs. WHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BXC drawdown since its inception was -97.46%, which is greater than WHD's maximum drawdown of -79.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BXC and WHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BXC | WHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.46% | -79.10% | -18.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.62% | -30.07% | -17.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.56% | -51.41% | -14.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.56% | -51.41% | -14.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -91.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -58.48% | -22.49% | -35.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.95% | -23.21% | -42.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.72% | 11.89% | +14.83% |
Volatility
BXC vs. WHD - Volatility Comparison
BlueLinx Holdings Inc. (BXC) has a higher volatility of 13.83% compared to Cactus, Inc. (WHD) at 10.51%. This indicates that BXC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BXC | WHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.83% | 10.51% | +3.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.25% | 28.98% | +18.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.26% | 40.86% | +18.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.22% | 44.58% | +11.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 70.26% | 52.62% | +17.64% |
Dividends
BXC vs. WHD - Dividend Comparison
BXC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BXC BlueLinx Holdings Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WHD Cactus, Inc. | 1.06% | 1.18% | 0.86% | 1.01% | 0.88% | 1.00% | 1.38% | 0.26% |
Financials
BXC vs. WHD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BlueLinx Holdings Inc. and Cactus, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BXC vs. WHD - Profitability Comparison
BXC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BlueLinx Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 116.40M and revenue of 731.15M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.9%.
WHD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cactus, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 388.35M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
BXC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BlueLinx Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 7.33M and revenue of 731.15M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.0%.
WHD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cactus, Inc. reported an operating income of 62.17M and revenue of 388.35M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.0%.
BXC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BlueLinx Holdings Inc. reported a net income of -1.46M and revenue of 731.15M, resulting in a net margin of -0.2%.
WHD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cactus, Inc. reported a net income of -48.60M and revenue of 388.35M, resulting in a net margin of -12.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BXC and WHD have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BXC has higher volatility (13.83%) compared to WHD (10.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BXC dropped -97.46% vs WHD's -79.10%.
WHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.53 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BXC and WHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer