OSUR vs. MED
OSUR (OraSure Technologies, Inc.) and MED (Medifast, Inc.) are both stocks. OSUR operates in Medical Instruments & Supplies (Healthcare), while MED operates in Personal Services (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, OSUR returned -4.53%/yr vs -7.79%/yr for MED. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
OSUR vs. MED - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OSUR achieves a 71.90% return, which is significantly higher than MED's 3.18% return. Over the past 10 years, OSUR has outperformed MED with an annualized return of -4.53%, while MED has yielded a comparatively lower -7.79% annualized return.
OSUR
- 1D
- -2.12%
- 1M
- 15.24%
- YTD
- 71.90%
- 6M
- 72.61%
- 1Y
- 38.67%
- 3Y*
- -6.63%
- 5Y*
- -15.45%
- 10Y*
- -4.53%
MED
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -12.47%
- YTD
- 3.18%
- 6M
- -2.74%
- 1Y
- -22.01%
- 3Y*
- -49.36%
- 5Y*
- -46.41%
- 10Y*
- -7.79%
OSUR vs. MED - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OSUR OraSure Technologies, Inc. | 71.90% | -32.96% | -55.98% | 70.12% | -44.53% | -17.90% | 31.82% | -31.25% | -38.07% | 114.81% |
MED Medifast, Inc. | 3.18% | -39.39% | -73.79% | -38.34% | -42.31% | 9.36% | 86.18% | -9.73% | 82.11% | 72.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between OSUR and MED is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1993 | 0.18 |
The correlation between OSUR and MED shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.24 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
OSUR:
$289.85M
MED:
$121.29M
OSUR:
-$0.73
MED:
-$1.82
OSUR:
3.53
MED:
0.35
OSUR:
$85.12M
MED:
$346.10M
OSUR:
$33.04M
MED:
$242.70M
OSUR:
-$47.07M
MED:
-$3.86M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OSUR vs. MED — Risk / Return Rank
OSUR
MED
OSUR vs. MED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OraSure Technologies, Inc. (OSUR) and Medifast, Inc. (MED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OSUR | MED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 0.93 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.99 | -0.59 | +1.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.22 | -1.00 | +3.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OSUR vs. MED - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OSUR drawdown since its inception was -90.75%, smaller than the maximum MED drawdown of -98.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OSUR and MED.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OSUR | MED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.75% | -98.40% | +7.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.37% | -37.39% | -1.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.73% | -90.91% | +16.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.23% | -96.29% | +12.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -90.75% | -96.76% | +6.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -81.76% | -96.26% | +14.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.72% | -50.87% | -5.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.46% | 22.13% | -4.67% |
Volatility
OSUR vs. MED - Volatility Comparison
OraSure Technologies, Inc. (OSUR) has a higher volatility of 20.12% compared to Medifast, Inc. (MED) at 10.40%. This indicates that OSUR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MED based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OSUR | MED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.12% | 10.40% | +9.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.50% | 31.76% | +2.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.62% | 41.83% | +6.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.97% | 45.28% | +9.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.94% | 47.73% | +9.21% |
Dividends
OSUR vs. MED - Dividend Comparison
Neither OSUR nor MED has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MED Medifast, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 7.36% | 5.69% | 2.71% | 2.30% | 3.08% | 1.75% | 2.06% | 2.57% | 0.82% |
OSUR OraSure Technologies, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
OSUR vs. MED - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between OraSure Technologies, Inc. and Medifast, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
OSUR vs. MED - Profitability Comparison
OSUR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, OraSure Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 11.80K and revenue of 27.93K. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.3%.
MED - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Medifast, Inc. reported a gross profit of 51.76M and revenue of 76.04M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.1%.
OSUR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, OraSure Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of -23.18K and revenue of 27.93K, resulting in an operating margin of -83.0%.
MED - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Medifast, Inc. reported an operating income of -3.30M and revenue of 76.04M, resulting in an operating margin of -4.3%.
OSUR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, OraSure Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of -22.38K and revenue of 27.93K, resulting in a net margin of -80.1%.
MED - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Medifast, Inc. reported a net income of -2.12M and revenue of 76.04M, resulting in a net margin of -2.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
OSUR and MED have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OSUR has higher volatility (20.12%) compared to MED (10.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OSUR dropped -90.75% vs MED's -98.40%.
OSUR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.80 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OSUR and MED
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer