OOQB vs. QQQ
OOQB (Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. OOQB is actively managed, while QQQ is passively managed. Over the past year, OOQB returned -27.35% vs 41.82% for QQQ. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OOQB charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
OOQB vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OOQB achieves a -18.43% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.30% return.
OOQB
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- -18.43%
- 6M
- -24.99%
- 1Y
- -27.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 10.60%
- YTD
- 21.30%
- 6M
- 19.66%
- 1Y
- 41.82%
- 3Y*
- 28.78%
- 5Y*
- 17.97%
- 10Y*
- 21.94%
OOQB vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
OOQB Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF | -18.43% | -13.30% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 21.30% | 14.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between OOQB and QQQ is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025 | 0.67 |
The correlation between OOQB and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OOQB vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
OOQB
QQQ
OOQB vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OOQB | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.45 | -0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.51 | 3.51 | -4.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.91 | 13.49 | -14.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OOQB | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.53 | 2.64 | -3.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.41 | 0.41 | -0.82 |
Drawdowns
OOQB vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OOQB drawdown since its inception was -53.44%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OOQB and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OOQB | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.44% | -82.97% | +29.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.44% | -11.96% | -41.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.69% | -0.26% | -43.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.26% | -32.79% | +9.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.11% | 3.11% | +27.00% |
Volatility
OOQB vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB) is 0.00%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 4.49%. This indicates that OOQB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OOQB | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 4.49% | -4.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.39% | 12.10% | +27.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.57% | 15.94% | +35.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.12% | 22.38% | +35.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 58.12% | 22.29% | +35.83% |
OOQB vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
OOQB has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
OOQB vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
OOQB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.62%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OOQB Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF | 11.62% | 9.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OOQB and QQQ have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQ has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to OOQB (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OOQB dropped -53.44% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 1-year performance, QQQ leads with 41.82% vs -27.35% for OOQB. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, OOQB has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 41.82% return vs -27.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for OOQB.
OOQB has the higher dividend yield at 11.62%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.
They also come from different issuers: Volatility Shares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for OOQB and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OOQB and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer