ONEY vs. SPYM
ONEY (SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF) and SPYM (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ONEY is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Yield Focused Factor Index, while SPYM is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ONEY returned 12.11%/yr vs 15.21%/yr for SPYM. Their 0.65 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ONEY charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for SPYM.
Performance
ONEY vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ONEY achieves a 19.04% return, which is significantly higher than SPYM's 11.77% return. Over the past 10 years, ONEY has underperformed SPYM with an annualized return of 12.11%, while SPYM has yielded a comparatively higher 15.21% annualized return.
ONEY
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- 1.85%
- 6M
- 12.55%
- YTD
- 19.04%
- 1Y
- 26.35%
- 3Y*
- 14.12%
- 5Y*
- 10.54%
- 10Y*
- 12.11%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.34%
SPYM
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- 1.73%
- 6M
- 9.55%
- YTD
- 11.77%
- 1Y
- 23.31%
- 3Y*
- 20.83%
- 5Y*
- 13.13%
- 10Y*
- 15.21%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.24%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.68M | $5.35M | $5.20M | |
| $833.33M | $955.26M | $1.11B |
ONEY vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ONEY SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF | 19.04% | 7.74% | 11.63% | 11.12% | -3.60% | 37.11% | 2.17% | 27.45% | -8.71% | 15.46% |
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 11.77% | 17.79% | 25.00% | 26.24% | -18.09% | 28.78% | 18.49% | 31.99% | -4.78% | 21.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between ONEY and SPYM is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2015 | 0.65 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ONEY and SPYM has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
ONEY vs. SPYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ONEY
SPYM
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Industrials
Energy
Technology
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Financial Services
ONEY
SPYM
Consumer Defensive
ONEY
SPYM
Real Estate
ONEY
SPYM
Consumer Cyclical
ONEY
SPYM
Utilities
ONEY
SPYM
Industrials
ONEY
SPYM
Energy
ONEY
SPYM
Technology
ONEY
SPYM
Basic Materials
ONEY
SPYM
Healthcare
ONEY
SPYM
Communication Services
ONEY
SPYM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ONEY vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank
ONEY
SPYM
ONEY vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF (ONEY) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ONEY | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.33 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.48 | 2.63 | +0.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.91 | 11.23 | +1.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ONEY vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ONEY drawdown since its inception was -46.80%, smaller than the maximum SPYM drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEY and SPYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ONEY | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.80% | -54.46% | +7.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.61% | -8.90% | +1.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.50% | -18.72% | +1.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.93% | -24.48% | +5.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.80% | -33.87% | -12.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.25% | 0.00% | -1.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.93% | -7.11% | +2.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.05% | 2.08% | -0.03% |
Volatility
ONEY vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF (ONEY) has a higher volatility of 4.17% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) at 3.76%. This indicates that ONEY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ONEY | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.17% | 3.76% | +0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.88% | 10.18% | -1.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.44% | 12.81% | -0.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.07% | 16.94% | -0.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.81% | 18.02% | +1.79% |
ONEY vs. SPYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
ONEY has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYM's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ONEY vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison
ONEY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, more than SPYM's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ONEY SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF | 2.76% | 3.15% | 3.18% | 3.14% | 3.17% | 2.46% | 2.74% | 3.17% | 3.72% | 10.73% | 6.31% | 0.29% |
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 1.02% | 1.13% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.79% | 2.23% | 1.75% | 1.97% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ONEY and SPYM have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ONEY has higher volatility (4.17%) compared to SPYM (3.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONEY dropped -46.80% vs SPYM's -54.46%.
On 10-year performance, SPYM leads with 15.21% vs 12.11% for ONEY. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SPYM has been the lower-risk option at 3.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPYM has performed better with a 15.21% return vs 12.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ONEY.
ONEY has the higher dividend yield at 2.76%, compared with 1.02% for SPYM.
ONEY is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while SPYM is S&P 500. ONEY tracks Russell 1000 Yield Focused Factor Index, while SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ONEY and 0.02% for SPYM.
ONEY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ONEY and SPYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer