PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ONEY vs. COWZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ONEY vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF (ONEY) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ONEY achieves a 14.26% return, which is significantly higher than COWZ's 8.18% return.


ONEY

1D
-0.18%
1M
3.52%
YTD
14.26%
6M
14.38%
1Y
23.42%
3Y*
15.65%
5Y*
8.74%
10Y*
12.04%

COWZ

1D
-0.34%
1M
2.61%
YTD
8.18%
6M
9.03%
1Y
22.23%
3Y*
14.44%
5Y*
10.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ONEY vs. COWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ONEY
SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF
14.26%7.74%11.63%11.12%-3.60%37.11%2.17%27.45%-8.71%15.46%
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
8.18%8.98%10.64%14.73%0.19%42.57%11.65%23.41%-10.05%20.22%

Correlation

The correlation between ONEY and COWZ is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2016

0.85

The correlation between ONEY and COWZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

ONEY vs. COWZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ONEY
COWZ

Industrials

13.9%
8.4%

Energy

13.2%
16.9%

Consumer Defensive

12.2%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

11.8%
11.7%

Utilities

10.6%

-

Financial Services

10.2%

-

Real Estate

9.7%

-

Basic Materials

8.2%
3.7%

Technology

4.8%
16.0%

Healthcare

3.8%
21.8%

Communication Services

1.6%
10.4%

Industrials

ONEY
13.9%
COWZ
8.4%

Energy

ONEY
13.2%
COWZ
16.9%

Consumer Defensive

ONEY
12.2%
COWZ
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

ONEY
11.8%
COWZ
11.7%

Utilities

ONEY
10.6%
COWZ

-

Financial Services

ONEY
10.2%
COWZ

-

Real Estate

ONEY
9.7%
COWZ

-

Basic Materials

ONEY
8.2%
COWZ
3.7%

Technology

ONEY
4.8%
COWZ
16.0%

Healthcare

ONEY
3.8%
COWZ
21.8%

Communication Services

ONEY
1.6%
COWZ
10.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ONEY vs. COWZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ONEY
ONEY Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
ONEY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONEY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONEY Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
ONEY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONEY Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

COWZ
COWZ Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
COWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
COWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
COWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
COWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ONEY vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF (ONEY) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ONEYCOWZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.36

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.09

4.46

-1.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.15

12.19

-1.04

ONEY vs. COWZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ONEY Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the COWZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ONEY and COWZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ONEYCOWZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90

2.02

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.60

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.65

-0.03

Drawdowns

ONEY vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONEY drawdown since its inception was -46.80%, which is greater than COWZ's maximum drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEY and COWZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ONEYCOWZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.80%

-38.63%

-8.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.61%

-5.00%

-2.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.50%

-22.00%

+4.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.93%

-22.00%

+3.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-0.91%

+0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.98%

-4.81%

-0.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

1.83%

+0.28%

Volatility

ONEY vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF (ONEY) has a higher volatility of 2.78% compared to Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) at 2.56%. This indicates that ONEY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ONEYCOWZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.78%

2.56%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.42%

7.12%

+1.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.39%

11.13%

+1.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.15%

17.63%

-1.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.87%

19.93%

-0.06%

ONEY vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ONEY has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

ONEY vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison

ONEY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, more than COWZ's 1.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
1.99%2.19%1.82%1.92%1.96%1.48%2.54%1.96%1.67%1.95%0.13%0.00%
ONEY
SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF
2.81%3.15%3.18%3.14%3.17%2.46%2.74%3.17%3.72%10.73%6.31%0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


ONEY and COWZ have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ONEY has higher volatility (2.78%) compared to COWZ (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONEY dropped -46.80% vs COWZ's -38.63%.

On 5-year performance, COWZ leads with 10.57% vs 8.74% for ONEY. On fees, ONEY is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, COWZ has been the lower-risk option at 2.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, COWZ has performed better with a 10.57% return vs 8.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ONEY is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for COWZ.

ONEY has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 1.99% for COWZ.

ONEY tracks Russell 1000 Yield Focused Factor Index, while COWZ tracks Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ONEY and 0.49% for COWZ.

COWZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ONEY and COWZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer