ONEQ vs. JHAC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Stock (ONEQ) and John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF (JHAC).

ONEQ and JHAC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ONEQ is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ Composite Index. It was launched on Sep 25, 2003. JHAC is an actively managed fund by John Hancock. It was launched on Nov 1, 2023.

Performance

ONEQ vs. JHAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Stock (ONEQ) and John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF (JHAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ONEQ vs. JHAC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ONEQ Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Stock	-6.77%	20.89%	29.30%	13.24%
JHAC John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF	-10.30%	3.33%	23.65%	15.41%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ONEQ achieves a -6.77% return, which is significantly higher than JHAC's -10.30% return.

ONEQ

• 1D: 3.78%
• 1M: -4.49%
• YTD: -6.77%
• 6M: -4.24%
• 1Y: 25.78%
• 3Y*: 21.89%
• 5Y*: 11.02%
• 10Y*: 17.18%

JHAC

• 1D: 1.89%
• 1M: -6.53%
• YTD: -10.30%
• 6M: -11.18%
• 1Y: 2.63%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ONEQ vs. JHAC - Expense Ratio Comparison

ONEQ has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than JHAC's 0.72% expense ratio.

JHAC

John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF

ONEQ

Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Stock

Return for Risk

ONEQ vs. JHAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ONEQ

ONEQ Risk / Return Rank: 72
ONEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
ONEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
ONEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 71
ONEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
ONEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 74

JHAC

JHAC Risk / Return Rank: 16
JHAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
JHAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
JHAC Omega Ratio Rank: 16
JHAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
JHAC Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ONEQ vs. JHAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Stock (ONEQ) and John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF (JHAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ONEQ	JHAC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.12	0.13	+0.98
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.72	0.33	+1.39
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.05	+0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.95	0.17	+1.78
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.24	0.54	+6.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ONEQ vs. JHAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ONEQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is higher than the JHAC Sharpe Ratio of 0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ONEQ and JHAC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ONEQ	JHAC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.12	0.13	+0.98
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.80	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	0.70	-0.10

Correlation

The correlation between ONEQ and JHAC is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

ONEQ vs. JHAC - Dividend Comparison

ONEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, more than JHAC's 0.64% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ONEQ Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Stock	0.83%	0.54%	0.65%	0.71%	0.97%	0.54%	0.71%	2.51%	1.08%	0.84%	1.12%	1.04%
JHAC John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF	0.64%	0.58%	0.66%	0.17%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

ONEQ vs. JHAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONEQ drawdown since its inception was -55.09%, which is greater than JHAC's maximum drawdown of -24.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEQ and JHAC.

Drawdown Indicators

	ONEQ	JHAC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.09%	-24.43%	-30.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.13%	-15.24%	+2.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.23%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.23%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.34%	-13.64%	+4.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.01%	-3.79%	-4.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.53%	4.75%	-1.22%

Volatility

ONEQ vs. JHAC - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Stock (ONEQ) has a higher volatility of 6.93% compared to John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF (JHAC) at 4.95%. This indicates that ONEQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JHAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ONEQ	JHAC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.93%	4.95%	+1.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.90%	10.15%	+2.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.22%	20.24%	+2.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.16%	17.77%	+4.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.67%	17.77%	+3.90%