PortfoliosLab logo
JHAC vs. MID
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between JHAC and MID is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

JHAC vs. MID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF (JHAC) and American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF (MID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

JHAC:

0.30

MID:

0.55

Sortino Ratio

JHAC:

0.47

MID:

0.83

Omega Ratio

JHAC:

1.07

MID:

1.11

Calmar Ratio

JHAC:

0.20

MID:

0.49

Martin Ratio

JHAC:

0.64

MID:

1.72

Ulcer Index

JHAC:

7.72%

MID:

6.78%

Daily Std Dev

JHAC:

22.36%

MID:

24.38%

Max Drawdown

JHAC:

-24.43%

MID:

-40.15%

Current Drawdown

JHAC:

-10.23%

MID:

-3.28%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHAC achieves a -5.87% return, which is significantly lower than MID's 4.80% return.


JHAC

YTD

-5.87%

1M

6.18%

6M

-9.16%

1Y

5.85%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

MID

YTD

4.80%

1M

8.98%

6M

-0.91%

1Y

13.06%

3Y*

13.93%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


JHAC vs. MID - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHAC has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than MID's 0.45% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

JHAC vs. MID — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHAC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of JHAC is 2727
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of JHAC is 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of JHAC is 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of JHAC is 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of JHAC is 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of JHAC is 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

MID
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MID is 4848
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MID is 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MID is 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MID is 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MID is 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MID is 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

JHAC vs. MID - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF (JHAC) and American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF (MID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current JHAC Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the MID Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHAC and MID, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

JHAC vs. MID - Dividend Comparison

JHAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, more than MID's 0.17% yield.


Drawdowns

JHAC vs. MID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHAC drawdown since its inception was -24.43%, smaller than the maximum MID drawdown of -40.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHAC and MID.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

JHAC vs. MID - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF (JHAC) is 5.53%, while American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF (MID) has a volatility of 5.86%. This indicates that JHAC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...