JHAC vs. BDGS
Compare and contrast key facts about John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF (JHAC) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS).
JHAC and BDGS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. JHAC is an actively managed fund by John Hancock. It was launched on Nov 1, 2023. BDGS is an actively managed fund by Bridges. It was launched on May 10, 2023.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: JHAC or BDGS.
Correlation
The correlation between JHAC and BDGS is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
JHAC vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
JHAC:
1.44
BDGS:
3.96
JHAC:
2.01
BDGS:
7.03
JHAC:
1.26
BDGS:
2.23
JHAC:
2.36
BDGS:
8.68
JHAC:
8.31
BDGS:
38.02
JHAC:
2.59%
BDGS:
0.55%
JHAC:
15.02%
BDGS:
5.25%
JHAC:
-9.13%
BDGS:
-5.38%
JHAC:
-3.63%
BDGS:
-0.15%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JHAC achieves a 1.05% return, which is significantly lower than BDGS's 2.55% return.
JHAC
1.05%
-0.60%
7.25%
21.27%
N/A
N/A
BDGS
2.55%
0.87%
9.10%
20.72%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JHAC vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
JHAC has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.85% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
JHAC vs. BDGS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
JHAC
BDGS
JHAC vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF (JHAC) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
JHAC vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison
JHAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than BDGS's 1.77% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|
JHAC John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF | 0.65% | 0.66% | 0.18% |
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF | 1.77% | 1.81% | 0.84% |
Drawdowns
JHAC vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JHAC drawdown since its inception was -9.13%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHAC and BDGS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
JHAC vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison
John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF (JHAC) has a higher volatility of 4.14% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 1.22%. This indicates that JHAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.