JHAC vs. BDGS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF (JHAC) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS).

JHAC and BDGS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. JHAC is an actively managed fund by John Hancock. It was launched on Nov 1, 2023. BDGS is an actively managed fund by Bridges. It was launched on May 10, 2023.

Performance

JHAC vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF (JHAC) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

JHAC vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
JHAC John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF	-10.30%	3.33%	23.65%	15.41%
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	-1.41%	10.61%	19.07%	6.40%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHAC achieves a -10.30% return, which is significantly lower than BDGS's -1.41% return.

JHAC

• 1D: 1.89%
• 1M: -6.53%
• YTD: -10.30%
• 6M: -11.18%
• 1Y: 2.63%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BDGS

• 1D: 1.96%
• 1M: -1.14%
• YTD: -1.41%
• 6M: 0.11%
• 1Y: 10.54%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHAC vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHAC has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.85% expense ratio.

BDGS

Bridges Capital Tactical ETF

JHAC

John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF

Return for Risk

JHAC vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHAC

JHAC Risk / Return Rank: 16
JHAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
JHAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
JHAC Omega Ratio Rank: 16
JHAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
JHAC Martin Ratio Rank: 16

BDGS

BDGS Risk / Return Rank: 73
BDGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
BDGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
BDGS Omega Ratio Rank: 78
BDGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
BDGS Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHAC vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF (JHAC) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JHAC	BDGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.13	0.99	-0.86
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.33	1.67	-1.34
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.28	-0.23
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.17	1.80	-1.63
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.54	9.34	-8.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JHAC vs. BDGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHAC Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is lower than the BDGS Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHAC and BDGS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JHAC	BDGS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13	0.99	-0.86
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.70	1.51	-0.81

Correlation

The correlation between JHAC and BDGS is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

JHAC vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

JHAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, more than BDGS's 0.56% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
JHAC John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF	0.64%	0.58%	0.66%	0.17%
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	0.56%	0.55%	1.81%	0.84%

Drawdowns

JHAC vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHAC drawdown since its inception was -24.43%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHAC and BDGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	JHAC	BDGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.43%	-9.12%	-15.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.24%	-5.85%	-9.39%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.64%	-2.15%	-11.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.79%	-0.67%	-3.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.75%	1.13%	+3.62%

Volatility

JHAC vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF (JHAC) has a higher volatility of 4.95% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 3.39%. This indicates that JHAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JHAC	BDGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.95%	3.39%	+1.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.15%	5.09%	+5.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.24%	10.70%	+9.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.77%	8.35%	+9.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.77%	8.35%	+9.42%