OND vs. SQQQ
OND (ProShares On-Demand ETF) and SQQQ (ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - OND is a Communications Equities fund tracking the FactSet On-Demand Index, while SQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, OND returned 16.43%/yr vs -56.19%/yr for SQQQ. At a correlation of -0.75, they often move in opposite directions. OND charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SQQQ.
Performance
OND vs. SQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OND achieves a -14.28% return, which is significantly higher than SQQQ's -45.27% return.
OND
- 1D
- -2.21%
- 1M
- 1.68%
- YTD
- -14.28%
- 6M
- -16.72%
- 1Y
- -8.96%
- 3Y*
- 16.43%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SQQQ
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -26.37%
- YTD
- -45.27%
- 6M
- -42.79%
- 1Y
- -65.16%
- 3Y*
- -56.19%
- 5Y*
- -49.17%
- 10Y*
- -56.01%
OND vs. SQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OND ProShares On-Demand ETF | -14.28% | 26.72% | 32.00% | 27.03% | -41.93% | -14.36% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | -45.27% | -53.05% | -49.79% | -73.61% | 82.40% | -16.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between OND and SQQQ is -0.69, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2021 | -0.75 |
The correlation between OND and SQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.75 to -0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
OND vs. SQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OND
SQQQ
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
OND
SQQQ
-
Communication Services
OND
SQQQ
-
Industrials
OND
SQQQ
-
Real Estate
OND
SQQQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
OND
SQQQ
-
Basic Materials
OND
-
SQQQ
-
Consumer Defensive
OND
-
SQQQ
-
Energy
OND
-
SQQQ
-
Financial Services
OND
-
SQQQ
Healthcare
OND
-
SQQQ
-
Utilities
OND
-
SQQQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OND vs. SQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
OND
SQQQ
OND vs. SQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares On-Demand ETF (OND) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OND | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | -1.37 | +0.93 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.48 | -2.63 | +2.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 0.72 | +0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.27 | -0.99 | +0.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.50 | -1.82 | +1.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OND | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.44 | -1.37 | +0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.08 | -0.88 | +0.80 |
Drawdowns
OND vs. SQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OND drawdown since its inception was -59.02%, smaller than the maximum SQQQ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OND and SQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OND | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.02% | -100.00% | +40.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.80% | -65.95% | +32.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.80% | -92.38% | +58.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -97.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.76% | -100.00% | +72.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.32% | -92.40% | +62.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.81% | 35.73% | -17.92% |
Volatility
OND vs. SQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares On-Demand ETF (OND) is 5.40%, while ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) has a volatility of 13.75%. This indicates that OND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OND | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.40% | 13.75% | -8.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.38% | 36.45% | -21.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.57% | 47.79% | -27.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.15% | 66.64% | -39.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.15% | 66.11% | -38.96% |
OND vs. SQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
OND has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than SQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
OND vs. SQQQ - Dividend Comparison
OND has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.48%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OND ProShares On-Demand ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | 12.48% | 9.36% | 10.23% | 8.01% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 2.15% | 2.92% | 1.47% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OND and SQQQ have a correlation of -0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SQQQ has higher volatility (13.75%) compared to OND (5.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OND dropped -59.02% vs SQQQ's -100.00%.
On 3-year performance, OND leads with 16.43% vs -56.19% for SQQQ. On fees, OND is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, OND has been the lower-risk option at 5.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, OND has performed better with a 16.43% return vs -56.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OND is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SQQQ.
SQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 12.48%, compared with 0.00% for OND.
OND is categorized as Communications Equities, while SQQQ is Leveraged Equities. OND tracks FactSet On-Demand Index, while SQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). Their fees differ too: 0.58% for OND and 0.95% for SQQQ.
OND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.44 vs -1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OND and SQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer