OND vs. PEJ
OND (ProShares On-Demand ETF) and PEJ (Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OND is a Communications Equities fund tracking the FactSet On-Demand Index, while PEJ is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment Intellidex Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, OND returned 11.90%/yr vs 16.45%/yr for PEJ. Their 0.69 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. OND charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PEJ.
Performance
OND vs. PEJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OND achieves a -15.89% return, which is significantly lower than PEJ's 9.41% return.
OND
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- -1.00%
- 6M
- -11.55%
- YTD
- -15.89%
- 1Y
- -17.52%
- 3Y*
- 11.90%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -2.61%
PEJ
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -0.54%
- 6M
- 11.47%
- YTD
- 9.41%
- 1Y
- 18.36%
- 3Y*
- 16.45%
- 5Y*
- 6.78%
- 10Y*
- 7.51%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.11%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.36K | $4.57K | $11.88K | |
| $2.30M | $2.56M | $2.67M |
OND vs. PEJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OND ProShares On-Demand ETF | -15.89% | 26.72% | 32.00% | 27.03% | -41.93% | -15.04% |
PEJ Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF | 9.41% | 17.78% | 25.08% | 15.73% | -25.37% | -4.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between OND and PEJ is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2021 | 0.69 |
The correlation between OND and PEJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
OND vs. PEJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OND
PEJ
Communication Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
OND
PEJ
Technology
OND
PEJ
Consumer Cyclical
OND
PEJ
Industrials
OND
PEJ
Real Estate
OND
PEJ
-
Basic Materials
OND
-
PEJ
-
Consumer Defensive
OND
-
PEJ
Energy
OND
-
PEJ
-
Financial Services
OND
-
PEJ
Healthcare
OND
-
PEJ
-
Utilities
OND
-
PEJ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OND vs. PEJ — Risk / Return Rank
OND
PEJ
OND vs. PEJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares On-Demand ETF (OND) and Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OND | PEJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.17 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.55 | 1.63 | -2.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.86 | 4.23 | -5.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OND vs. PEJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OND drawdown since its inception was -59.02%, smaller than the maximum PEJ drawdown of -66.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OND and PEJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OND | PEJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.02% | -66.03% | +7.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.80% | -10.29% | -23.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.80% | -25.75% | -8.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -58.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.12% | -1.43% | -27.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.27% | -12.24% | -18.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.38% | 3.95% | +17.43% |
Volatility
OND vs. PEJ - Volatility Comparison
ProShares On-Demand ETF (OND) has a higher volatility of 5.56% compared to Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ) at 4.73%. This indicates that OND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PEJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OND | PEJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.56% | 4.73% | +0.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.70% | 14.85% | +1.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.12% | 18.67% | +2.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.97% | 22.69% | +4.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.97% | 24.72% | +2.25% |
OND vs. PEJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
OND has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than PEJ's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
OND vs. PEJ - Dividend Comparison
OND has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PEJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OND ProShares On-Demand ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PEJ Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF | 0.50% | 0.24% | 0.40% | 0.46% | 0.43% | 0.34% | 0.92% | 0.39% | 0.78% | 0.68% | 0.68% | 0.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OND and PEJ have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OND has higher volatility (5.56%) compared to PEJ (4.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OND dropped -59.02% vs PEJ's -66.03%.
On 3-year performance, PEJ leads with 16.45% vs 11.90% for OND. On fees, PEJ is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, PEJ has been the lower-risk option at 4.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PEJ has performed better with a 16.45% return vs 11.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PEJ is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for OND.
PEJ has the higher dividend yield at 0.50%, compared with 0.00% for OND.
OND is categorized as Communications Equities, while PEJ is Consumer Discretionary Equities. OND tracks FactSet On-Demand Index, while PEJ tracks Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment Intellidex Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for OND and 0.55% for PEJ.
PEJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.90 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OND and PEJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer