OND vs. PEJ
OND (ProShares On-Demand ETF) and PEJ (Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OND is a Communications Equities fund tracking the FactSet On-Demand Index, while PEJ is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment Intellidex Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, OND returned 17.30%/yr vs 16.30%/yr for PEJ. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OND charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PEJ.
Performance
OND vs. PEJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OND achieves a -12.34% return, which is significantly lower than PEJ's 2.75% return.
OND
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 3.42%
- YTD
- -12.34%
- 6M
- -15.06%
- 1Y
- -6.53%
- 3Y*
- 17.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PEJ
- 1D
- -1.32%
- 1M
- 3.10%
- YTD
- 2.75%
- 6M
- 6.26%
- 1Y
- 17.69%
- 3Y*
- 16.30%
- 5Y*
- 4.19%
- 10Y*
- 6.65%
OND vs. PEJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OND ProShares On-Demand ETF | -12.34% | 26.72% | 32.00% | 27.03% | -41.93% | -14.36% |
PEJ Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF | 2.75% | 17.78% | 25.08% | 15.73% | -25.37% | -3.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between OND and PEJ is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2021 | 0.70 |
The correlation between OND and PEJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
OND vs. PEJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OND
PEJ
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
OND
PEJ
Communication Services
OND
PEJ
Industrials
OND
PEJ
Real Estate
OND
PEJ
-
Consumer Cyclical
OND
PEJ
Basic Materials
OND
-
PEJ
-
Consumer Defensive
OND
-
PEJ
Energy
OND
-
PEJ
-
Financial Services
OND
-
PEJ
-
Healthcare
OND
-
PEJ
-
Utilities
OND
-
PEJ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OND vs. PEJ — Risk / Return Rank
OND
PEJ
OND vs. PEJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares On-Demand ETF (OND) and Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OND | PEJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | 0.96 | -1.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.31 | 1.52 | -1.84 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.18 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.16 | 1.79 | -1.96 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.31 | 4.65 | -4.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OND | PEJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.32 | 0.96 | -1.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.06 | 0.33 | -0.39 |
Drawdowns
OND vs. PEJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OND drawdown since its inception was -59.02%, smaller than the maximum PEJ drawdown of -66.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OND and PEJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OND | PEJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.02% | -66.03% | +7.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.80% | -10.29% | -23.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.80% | -25.75% | -8.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -58.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.13% | -1.53% | -24.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.32% | -12.32% | -18.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.73% | 3.96% | +13.77% |
Volatility
OND vs. PEJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares On-Demand ETF (OND) is 4.88%, while Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ) has a volatility of 6.23%. This indicates that OND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PEJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OND | PEJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.88% | 6.23% | -1.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.25% | 13.85% | +1.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.48% | 18.45% | +2.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.14% | 22.79% | +4.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.14% | 24.75% | +2.39% |
OND vs. PEJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
OND has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than PEJ's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
OND vs. PEJ - Dividend Comparison
OND has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PEJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OND ProShares On-Demand ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PEJ Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF | 0.39% | 0.24% | 0.40% | 0.46% | 0.43% | 0.34% | 0.92% | 0.39% | 0.78% | 0.68% | 0.68% | 0.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OND and PEJ have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PEJ has higher volatility (6.23%) compared to OND (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OND dropped -59.02% vs PEJ's -66.03%.
On 3-year performance, OND leads with 17.30% vs 16.30% for PEJ. On fees, PEJ is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, OND has been the lower-risk option at 4.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, OND has performed better with a 17.30% return vs 16.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PEJ is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for OND.
PEJ has the higher dividend yield at 0.39%, compared with 0.00% for OND.
OND is categorized as Communications Equities, while PEJ is Consumer Discretionary Equities. OND tracks FactSet On-Demand Index, while PEJ tracks Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment Intellidex Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for OND and 0.55% for PEJ.
PEJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OND and PEJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer