OMFL vs. PMYYX
OMFL (Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF) and PMYYX (Putnam Multi-Cap Core Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, OMFL returned 8.89%/yr vs 13.37%/yr for PMYYX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. OMFL charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for PMYYX.
Performance
OMFL vs. PMYYX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OMFL achieves a 10.40% return, which is significantly higher than PMYYX's 7.12% return.
OMFL
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -1.15%
- YTD
- 10.40%
- 6M
- 9.24%
- 1Y
- 20.52%
- 3Y*
- 13.20%
- 5Y*
- 8.89%
- 10Y*
- —
PMYYX
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 7.12%
- 6M
- 6.13%
- 1Y
- 23.76%
- 3Y*
- 21.00%
- 5Y*
- 13.37%
- 10Y*
- 16.71%
OMFL vs. PMYYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OMFL Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | 10.40% | 13.68% | 6.82% | 21.53% | -13.97% | 28.95% | 20.91% | 35.58% | -2.55% | 5.12% |
PMYYX Putnam Multi-Cap Core Fund | 7.12% | 17.33% | 26.46% | 27.98% | -15.94% | 30.93% | 17.69% | 32.52% | -7.91% | 5.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between OMFL and PMYYX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2017 | 0.86 |
The correlation between OMFL and PMYYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OMFL vs. PMYYX — Risk / Return Rank
OMFL
PMYYX
OMFL vs. PMYYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) and Putnam Multi-Cap Core Fund (PMYYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OMFL | PMYYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.36 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.72 | 2.49 | +0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.06 | 10.78 | +1.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OMFL vs. PMYYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OMFL drawdown since its inception was -33.24%, smaller than the maximum PMYYX drawdown of -35.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OMFL and PMYYX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OMFL | PMYYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.24% | -35.25% | +2.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.58% | -10.02% | +2.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.52% | -18.92% | +3.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.44% | -23.52% | +1.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.57% | -1.49% | -1.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.78% | -4.11% | -0.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.71% | 2.31% | -0.60% |
Volatility
OMFL vs. PMYYX - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) and Putnam Multi-Cap Core Fund (PMYYX) have volatilities of 4.33% and 4.39%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OMFL | PMYYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.33% | 4.39% | -0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.03% | 9.84% | +0.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.54% | 12.54% | 0.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.81% | 16.88% | -0.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.09% | 18.43% | +1.66% |
OMFL vs. PMYYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
OMFL has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than PMYYX's 0.71% expense ratio.
Dividends
OMFL vs. PMYYX - Dividend Comparison
OMFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than PMYYX's 2.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OMFL Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | 0.83% | 0.80% | 1.22% | 1.37% | 1.55% | 0.95% | 1.48% | 1.53% | 1.39% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PMYYX Putnam Multi-Cap Core Fund | 2.58% | 2.76% | 4.47% | 2.62% | 5.26% | 9.25% | 2.41% | 4.76% | 2.36% | 2.71% | 1.21% | 1.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, OMFL and PMYYX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
PMYYX has higher volatility (4.39%) compared to OMFL (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OMFL dropped -33.24% vs PMYYX's -35.25%.
PMYYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OMFL and PMYYX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer