OMC vs. HAL
OMC (Omnicom Group Inc.) and HAL (Halliburton Company) are both stocks. OMC operates in Advertising Agencies (Communication Services), while HAL operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy). Over the past 10 years, OMC returned 2.86%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for HAL. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
OMC vs. HAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OMC achieves a -3.07% return, which is significantly lower than HAL's 41.41% return. Over the past 10 years, OMC has outperformed HAL with an annualized return of 2.86%, while HAL has yielded a comparatively lower 0.88% annualized return.
OMC
- 1D
- 1.44%
- 1M
- 4.39%
- YTD
- -3.07%
- 6M
- -1.50%
- 1Y
- 12.04%
- 3Y*
- -3.71%
- 5Y*
- 1.80%
- 10Y*
- 2.86%
HAL
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -3.05%
- YTD
- 41.41%
- 6M
- 39.63%
- 1Y
- 84.34%
- 3Y*
- 9.02%
- 5Y*
- 12.63%
- 10Y*
- 0.88%
OMC vs. HAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OMC Omnicom Group Inc. | -3.07% | -2.62% | 2.49% | 9.57% | 15.72% | 21.88% | -19.58% | 14.37% | 3.94% | -11.93% |
HAL Halliburton Company | 41.41% | 7.02% | -23.19% | -6.47% | 74.45% | 21.99% | -21.23% | -4.90% | -44.63% | -8.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between OMC and HAL is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990 | 0.28 |
The correlation between OMC and HAL shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.32 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
OMC:
$0.51
HAL:
$1.82
OMC:
149.30
HAL:
21.80
OMC:
9.31
HAL:
3.48
OMC:
0.58
HAL:
1.51
OMC:
$19.82B
HAL:
$22.17B
OMC:
$3.45B
HAL:
$3.40B
OMC:
$1.14B
HAL:
$3.83B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OMC vs. HAL — Risk / Return Rank
OMC
HAL
OMC vs. HAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Omnicom Group Inc. (OMC) and Halliburton Company (HAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OMC | HAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.36 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.68 | 6.47 | -5.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.53 | 16.47 | -14.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OMC vs. HAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OMC drawdown since its inception was -61.22%, smaller than the maximum HAL drawdown of -92.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OMC and HAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OMC | HAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.22% | -92.99% | +31.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.85% | -13.10% | -4.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.30% | -54.01% | +20.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.30% | -54.01% | +20.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.21% | -91.45% | +48.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.40% | -32.89% | +10.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.93% | -39.12% | +26.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.87% | 5.14% | +2.73% |
Volatility
OMC vs. HAL - Volatility Comparison
Omnicom Group Inc. (OMC) and Halliburton Company (HAL) have volatilities of 9.23% and 9.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OMC | HAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.23% | 9.32% | -0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.73% | 24.13% | +2.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.65% | 36.76% | -2.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.75% | 40.18% | -11.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.73% | 45.96% | -17.23% |
Dividends
OMC vs. HAL - Dividend Comparison
OMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, more than HAL's 1.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAL Halliburton Company | 1.72% | 2.41% | 2.50% | 1.77% | 1.22% | 0.79% | 1.67% | 2.94% | 2.71% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 2.12% |
OMC Omnicom Group Inc. | 4.04% | 3.59% | 3.25% | 3.24% | 3.43% | 3.82% | 4.17% | 3.21% | 3.28% | 3.09% | 2.53% | 2.64% |
Financials
OMC vs. HAL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Omnicom Group Inc. and Halliburton Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
OMC vs. HAL - Profitability Comparison
OMC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Omnicom Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.04B and revenue of 6.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.6%.
HAL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Halliburton Company reported a gross profit of 790.00M and revenue of 5.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.6%.
OMC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Omnicom Group Inc. reported an operating income of 646.20M and revenue of 6.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.4%.
HAL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Halliburton Company reported an operating income of 679.00M and revenue of 5.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.6%.
OMC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Omnicom Group Inc. reported a net income of 418.70M and revenue of 6.24B, resulting in a net margin of 6.7%.
HAL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Halliburton Company reported a net income of 461.00M and revenue of 5.40B, resulting in a net margin of 8.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
OMC and HAL have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HAL has higher volatility (9.32%) compared to OMC (9.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OMC dropped -61.22% vs HAL's -92.99%.
HAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OMC and HAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer