OMC vs. FANG
OMC (Omnicom Group Inc.) and FANG (Diamondback Energy, Inc.) are both stocks. OMC operates in Advertising Agencies (Communication Services), while FANG operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy). Over the past 10 years, OMC returned 2.40%/yr vs 11.82%/yr for FANG. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
OMC vs. FANG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OMC achieves a -7.77% return, which is significantly lower than FANG's 41.70% return. Over the past 10 years, OMC has underperformed FANG with an annualized return of 2.40%, while FANG has yielded a comparatively higher 11.82% annualized return.
OMC
- 1D
- -1.97%
- 1M
- -3.32%
- YTD
- -7.77%
- 6M
- 5.93%
- 1Y
- 7.25%
- 3Y*
- -3.67%
- 5Y*
- 1.20%
- 10Y*
- 2.40%
FANG
- 1D
- 4.05%
- 1M
- -0.91%
- YTD
- 41.70%
- 6M
- 34.50%
- 1Y
- 51.83%
- 3Y*
- 21.41%
- 5Y*
- 24.85%
- 10Y*
- 11.82%
OMC vs. FANG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OMC Omnicom Group Inc. | -7.77% | -2.62% | 2.49% | 9.57% | 15.72% | 21.88% | -19.58% | 14.37% | 3.94% | -11.93% |
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 41.70% | -5.64% | 10.35% | 19.66% | 35.34% | 127.51% | -46.00% | 0.92% | -26.35% | 24.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between OMC and FANG is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2012 | 0.27 |
Over the past year, the correlation between OMC and FANG has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.27, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
OMC:
$0.51
FANG:
$1.40
OMC:
143.58
FANG:
150.29
OMC:
0.55
FANG:
3.99
OMC:
$19.82B
FANG:
$15.19B
OMC:
$3.45B
FANG:
$7.30B
OMC:
$1.14B
FANG:
$5.54B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OMC vs. FANG — Risk / Return Rank
OMC
FANG
OMC vs. FANG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Omnicom Group Inc. (OMC) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OMC | FANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.27 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.41 | 4.16 | -3.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.94 | 8.28 | -7.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OMC | FANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 | 1.69 | -1.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | 0.66 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 | 0.24 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.48 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
OMC vs. FANG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OMC drawdown since its inception was -61.22%, smaller than the maximum FANG drawdown of -88.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OMC and FANG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OMC | FANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.22% | -88.72% | +27.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.85% | -12.53% | -5.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.30% | -42.10% | +8.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.30% | -42.10% | +8.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.21% | -88.72% | +45.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.16% | -0.91% | -25.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.92% | -19.40% | +6.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.70% | 6.28% | +1.42% |
Volatility
OMC vs. FANG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Omnicom Group Inc. (OMC) is 9.38%, while Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) has a volatility of 11.40%. This indicates that OMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FANG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OMC | FANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.38% | 11.40% | -2.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.52% | 22.81% | +4.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.68% | 31.01% | +3.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.72% | 37.88% | -9.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.73% | 49.03% | -20.30% |
Dividends
OMC vs. FANG - Dividend Comparison
OMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, more than FANG's 1.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 1.97% | 2.66% | 5.06% | 5.15% | 6.55% | 1.62% | 3.10% | 0.74% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OMC Omnicom Group Inc. | 4.07% | 3.59% | 3.25% | 3.24% | 3.43% | 3.82% | 4.17% | 3.21% | 3.28% | 3.09% | 2.53% | 2.64% |
Financials
OMC vs. FANG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Omnicom Group Inc. and Diamondback Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
OMC vs. FANG - Profitability Comparison
OMC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Omnicom Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.04B and revenue of 6.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.6%.
FANG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.85B and revenue of 4.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 90.9%.
OMC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Omnicom Group Inc. reported an operating income of 646.20M and revenue of 6.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.4%.
FANG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 30.00M and revenue of 4.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.7%.
OMC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Omnicom Group Inc. reported a net income of 418.70M and revenue of 6.24B, resulting in a net margin of 6.7%.
FANG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 144.00M and revenue of 4.24B, resulting in a net margin of 3.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
OMC and FANG have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FANG has higher volatility (11.40%) compared to OMC (9.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OMC dropped -61.22% vs FANG's -88.72%.
FANG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OMC and FANG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer