PortfoliosLab logo
OMC vs. FANG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between OMC and FANG is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

OMC vs. FANG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Omnicom Group Inc. (OMC) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

OMC:

-0.65

FANG:

-0.77

Sortino Ratio

OMC:

-0.69

FANG:

-0.92

Omega Ratio

OMC:

0.90

FANG:

0.87

Calmar Ratio

OMC:

-0.54

FANG:

-0.71

Martin Ratio

OMC:

-1.20

FANG:

-1.60

Ulcer Index

OMC:

14.42%

FANG:

18.72%

Daily Std Dev

OMC:

27.92%

FANG:

38.92%

Max Drawdown

OMC:

-61.22%

FANG:

-88.72%

Current Drawdown

OMC:

-26.83%

FANG:

-33.05%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

OMC:

$14.87B

FANG:

$40.29B

EPS

OMC:

$7.32

FANG:

$16.08

PE Ratio

OMC:

10.38

FANG:

8.58

PEG Ratio

OMC:

1.43

FANG:

1.20

PS Ratio

OMC:

0.95

FANG:

3.26

PB Ratio

OMC:

3.42

FANG:

1.03

Total Revenue (TTM)

OMC:

$15.75B

FANG:

$12.87B

Gross Profit (TTM)

OMC:

$2.93B

FANG:

$8.81B

EBITDA (TTM)

OMC:

$2.63B

FANG:

$8.98B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OMC achieves a -11.00% return, which is significantly higher than FANG's -15.24% return. Over the past 10 years, OMC has underperformed FANG with an annualized return of 3.27%, while FANG has yielded a comparatively higher 8.22% annualized return.


OMC

YTD

-11.00%

1M

2.66%

6M

-26.10%

1Y

-18.27%

5Y*

11.19%

10Y*

3.27%

FANG

YTD

-15.24%

1M

11.96%

6M

-23.27%

1Y

-29.46%

5Y*

33.28%

10Y*

8.22%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

OMC vs. FANG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OMC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of OMC is 1818
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of OMC is 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of OMC is 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of OMC is 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of OMC is 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of OMC is 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

FANG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FANG is 1111
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FANG is 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FANG is 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FANG is 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FANG is 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FANG is 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

OMC vs. FANG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Omnicom Group Inc. (OMC) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current OMC Sharpe Ratio is -0.65, which is comparable to the FANG Sharpe Ratio of -0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OMC and FANG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

OMC vs. FANG - Dividend Comparison

OMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, less than FANG's 4.50% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
OMC
Omnicom Group Inc.
3.69%3.25%3.24%3.43%3.82%4.17%3.21%3.28%3.09%2.53%2.64%2.45%
FANG
Diamondback Energy, Inc.
4.50%5.06%5.15%6.55%1.62%3.10%0.74%0.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

OMC vs. FANG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OMC drawdown since its inception was -61.22%, smaller than the maximum FANG drawdown of -88.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OMC and FANG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

OMC vs. FANG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Omnicom Group Inc. (OMC) is 11.03%, while Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) has a volatility of 15.41%. This indicates that OMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FANG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

OMC vs. FANG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Omnicom Group Inc. and Diamondback Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20212022202320242025
3.69B
4.05B
(OMC) Total Revenue
(FANG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

OMC vs. FANG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Omnicom Group Inc. and Diamondback Energy, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
17.1%
91.6%
(OMC) Gross Margin
(FANG) Gross Margin
OMC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Omnicom Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 629.50M and revenue of 3.69B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.1%.

FANG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.71B and revenue of 4.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 91.6%.

OMC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Omnicom Group Inc. reported an operating income of 452.60M and revenue of 3.69B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.3%.

FANG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 17.00M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.4%.

OMC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Omnicom Group Inc. reported a net income of 287.70M and revenue of 3.69B, resulting in a net margin of 7.8%.

FANG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 1.41B and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in a net margin of 34.7%.