PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
OMC vs. COST
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


OMCCOST
YTD Return24.34%34.72%
1Y Return43.97%58.56%
3Y Return (Ann)15.18%26.07%
5Y Return (Ann)10.89%26.13%
10Y Return (Ann)8.08%23.94%
Sharpe Ratio2.092.97
Sortino Ratio2.773.58
Omega Ratio1.361.53
Calmar Ratio1.735.71
Martin Ratio11.7514.71
Ulcer Index3.55%3.99%
Daily Std Dev19.97%19.77%
Max Drawdown-61.22%-70.95%
Current Drawdown-0.26%-3.47%

Fundamentals


OMCCOST
Market Cap$20.53B$392.25B
EPS$7.32$16.59
PE Ratio14.3753.36
PEG Ratio1.466.32
Total Revenue (TTM)$15.43B$254.45B
Gross Profit (TTM)$2.49B$32.10B
EBITDA (TTM)$2.58B$10.63B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between OMC and COST is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

OMC vs. COST - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, OMC achieves a 24.34% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 34.72% return. Over the past 10 years, OMC has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 8.08%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 23.94% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
16.67%
24.85%
OMC
COST

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

OMC vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Omnicom Group Inc. (OMC) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OMC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for OMC, currently valued at 2.09, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.09
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for OMC, currently valued at 2.77, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.77
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for OMC, currently valued at 1.36, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.36
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for OMC, currently valued at 1.73, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.73
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for OMC, currently valued at 11.75, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.0011.75
COST
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for COST, currently valued at 2.97, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.97
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for COST, currently valued at 3.58, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.58
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for COST, currently valued at 1.53, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.53
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for COST, currently valued at 5.71, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.005.71
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for COST, currently valued at 14.71, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.0014.71

OMC vs. COST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OMC Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the COST Sharpe Ratio of 2.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OMC and COST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
2.09
2.97
OMC
COST

Dividends

OMC vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

OMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, more than COST's 2.19% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
OMC
Omnicom Group Inc.
2.66%3.24%3.43%3.82%4.17%3.21%3.28%3.09%2.53%2.64%2.45%2.15%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
2.19%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%0.97%1.01%

Drawdowns

OMC vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OMC drawdown since its inception was -61.22%, smaller than the maximum COST drawdown of -70.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OMC and COST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
-0.26%
-3.47%
OMC
COST

Volatility

OMC vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Omnicom Group Inc. (OMC) is 4.45%, while Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) has a volatility of 5.13%. This indicates that OMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%10.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
4.45%
5.13%
OMC
COST

Financials

OMC vs. COST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Omnicom Group Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items