PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OILU vs. GDXD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

OILU vs. GDXD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN (OILU) and MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (GDXD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

OILU vs. GDXD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
OILU
MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN
137.69%-16.50%-21.65%-32.50%151.08%-17.87%
GDXD
MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs
-51.34%-97.53%-57.78%-52.35%-52.56%0.96%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OILU achieves a 137.69% return, which is significantly higher than GDXD's -51.34% return.


OILU

1D
-4.17%
1M
33.09%
YTD
137.69%
6M
126.29%
1Y
64.88%
3Y*
11.21%
5Y*
10Y*

GDXD

1D
-21.63%
1M
68.00%
YTD
-51.34%
6M
-76.21%
1Y
-96.70%
3Y*
-84.06%
5Y*
-75.49%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


OILU vs. GDXD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both OILU and GDXD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Return for Risk

OILU vs. GDXD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OILU
OILU Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
OILU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OILU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
OILU Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
OILU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
OILU Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

GDXD
GDXD Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
GDXD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDXD Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDXD Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
GDXD Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDXD Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OILU vs. GDXD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN (OILU) and MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (GDXD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OILUGDXDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.86

-0.70

+1.56

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.43

-2.54

+3.97

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

0.73

+0.48

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

-0.98

+2.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.31

-1.20

+3.51

OILU vs. GDXD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OILU Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is higher than the GDXD Sharpe Ratio of -0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OILU and GDXD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OILUGDXDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

-0.70

+1.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

-0.68

+0.92

Correlation

The correlation between OILU and GDXD is -0.25. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

OILU vs. GDXD - Dividend Comparison

Neither OILU nor GDXD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

OILU vs. GDXD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OILU drawdown since its inception was -81.00%, smaller than the maximum GDXD drawdown of -99.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OILU and GDXD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


OILUGDXDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.00%

-99.96%

+18.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.04%

-98.51%

+46.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.07%

-99.93%

+63.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.73%

-70.92%

+20.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.72%

80.64%

-49.92%

Volatility

OILU vs. GDXD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN (OILU) is 16.19%, while MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (GDXD) has a volatility of 54.68%. This indicates that OILU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


OILUGDXDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.19%

54.68%

-38.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.42%

110.83%

-68.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

76.32%

138.20%

-61.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

81.18%

108.13%

-26.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

81.18%

108.21%

-27.03%