GDXD vs. GLD
Compare and contrast key facts about MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (GDXD) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD).
GDXD and GLD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GDXD is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the S-Network MicroSectors Gold Miners Index - Benchmark TR Gross (-300%). It was launched on Dec 2, 2020. GLD is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold Price PM. It was launched on Nov 18, 2004. Both GDXD and GLD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
GDXD vs. GLD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GDXD vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDXD MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | -51.34% | -97.53% | -57.78% | -52.35% | -52.56% | -19.71% | -13.30% |
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 8.57% | 63.68% | 26.66% | 12.69% | -0.77% | -4.15% | 3.21% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDXD achieves a -51.34% return, which is significantly lower than GLD's 8.57% return.
GDXD
- 1D
- -21.63%
- 1M
- 68.00%
- YTD
- -51.34%
- 6M
- -76.21%
- 1Y
- -96.70%
- 3Y*
- -84.06%
- 5Y*
- -75.49%
- 10Y*
- —
GLD
- 1D
- 3.79%
- 1M
- -11.05%
- YTD
- 8.57%
- 6M
- 21.05%
- 1Y
- 49.33%
- 3Y*
- 32.92%
- 5Y*
- 21.58%
- 10Y*
- 13.92%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GDXD vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDXD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GDXD vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank
GDXD
GLD
GDXD vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (GDXD) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GDXD | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.70 | 1.79 | -2.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.54 | 2.21 | -4.75 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.73 | 1.33 | -0.60 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.98 | 2.68 | -3.66 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.20 | 9.90 | -11.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GDXD | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.70 | 1.79 | -2.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.70 | 1.22 | -1.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.68 | 0.62 | -1.31 |
Correlation
The correlation between GDXD and GLD is -0.79. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
GDXD vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison
Neither GDXD nor GLD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
GDXD vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDXD drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXD and GLD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDXD | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.96% | -45.56% | -54.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -98.51% | -19.21% | -79.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.96% | -21.03% | -78.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.93% | -13.23% | -86.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -70.92% | -16.17% | -54.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 80.64% | 5.20% | +75.44% |
Volatility
GDXD vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (GDXD) has a higher volatility of 54.68% compared to SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) at 11.06%. This indicates that GDXD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GDXD | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 54.68% | 11.06% | +43.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 110.83% | 24.30% | +86.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 138.20% | 27.80% | +110.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 108.13% | 17.74% | +90.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 108.21% | 15.87% | +92.34% |